From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, kent.overstreet@linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched.h: always_inline alloc_tag_{save|restore} to fix modpost warnings
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:51:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240703155129.cbd023c14dee61e5727bb750@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240703221520.4108464-1-surenb@google.com>
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:15:20 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
> Mark alloc_tag_{save|restore} as always_inline to fix the following
> modpost warnings:
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: alloc_tag_save+0x1c (section: .text.unlikely) -> initcall_level_names (section: .init.data)
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: alloc_tag_restore+0x3c (section: .text.unlikely) -> initcall_level_names (section: .init.data)
Well, is it only about fixing warnings? If the warning is correct then
this might be fixing kernel crashes.
Do you know where these references are coming from?
I'm curious about the .text.unlikely. Makes me wonder if we should
also have .init.unlikely for unlikely() calls which happen from __init
code. Maybe we already handle that.
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407032306.gi9nZsBi-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Fixes: 22d407b164ff ("lib: add allocation tagging support for memory allocation profiling")
Cc: stable
yes?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-03 22:15 Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-03 22:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-07-03 23:23 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 0:10 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 3:46 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 3:54 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-04 4:07 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 4:17 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-04 4:25 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 5:17 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240703155129.cbd023c14dee61e5727bb750@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®