From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, kent.overstreet@linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched.h: always_inline alloc_tag_{save|restore} to fix modpost warnings
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 22:17:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240703221700.dd699b48a395bdc27ddeb827@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpEO3Lo9EZGQtdPUeyycbNwqJ7zvHq2N9nzd_Cc6pARchw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:25:30 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
> > > I don't think it's really a problem. __init function is executing, it
> > > calls a function from .text (say alloc_tag_save() that was not
> > > inlined) which in turn calls get_current(), which returns a pointer
> > > somewhere inside __initdata. That should be fine since this can only
> > > happen during init stage. If this call happens after init,
> > > get_current() can't return a pointer from __initdata. If it does then
> > > we have a much bigger problem.
> >
> > So I think you're saying "yes, the warning is legitimate and this might
> > be a problem, but it isn't in this case, so the checking code is OK so
> > let's just work around it"?
>
> Yes, that's my understanding. If get_current() always returns a valid
> pointer for the given execution stage (during init/after init) then it
> should be safe to call it even from a function residing in the .text
> section during init.
Make sense, thanks for confirming. I'll await the v2 series, if
you think it remains appropriate?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-04 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-03 22:15 Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-03 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-03 23:23 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 0:10 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 3:46 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 3:54 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-04 4:07 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 4:17 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-04 4:25 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-07-04 5:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240703221700.dd699b48a395bdc27ddeb827@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®