From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Add wq_online_cpumask and remove cpus_read_lock() from apply_wqattrs_lock()
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:35:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711083547.3981-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
The new wq_online_mask mirrors the cpu_online_mask except during
hotplugging; specifically, it differs between the hotplugging stages
of workqueue_offline_cpu() and workqueue_online_cpu(), during which
the transitioning CPU is not represented in the mask.
With wq_online_cpumask, cpus_read_lock() is unneeded for wqattrs changes.
Lai Jiangshan (7):
workqueue: Add wq_online_cpumask
workqueue: Simplify wq_calc_pod_cpumask() with wq_online_cpumask
workqueue: Remove cpus_read_lock() from apply_wqattrs_lock()
workqueue: Remove the unneeded cpumask empty check in
wq_calc_pod_cpumask()
workqueue: Remove the argument @cpu_going_down from
wq_calc_pod_cpumask()
workqueue: Remove the arguments @hotplug_cpu and @online from
wq_update_pod()
workqueue: Rename wq_update_pod() to unbound_wq_update_pwq()
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
kernel/workqueue.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 8:35 Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2024-07-11 8:35 ` [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: Add wq_online_cpumask Lai Jiangshan
2024-07-11 8:35 ` [PATCH 2/7] workqueue: Simplify wq_calc_pod_cpumask() with wq_online_cpumask Lai Jiangshan
2024-07-11 8:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] workqueue: Remove cpus_read_lock() from apply_wqattrs_lock() Lai Jiangshan
2024-07-11 17:11 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2024-07-15 15:13 ` Daniel Jordan
2024-07-15 17:22 ` Tejun Heo
2024-07-16 2:01 ` [PATCH " Pengfei Xu
2024-07-11 8:35 ` [PATCH 4/7] workqueue: Remove the unneeded cpumask empty check in wq_calc_pod_cpumask() Lai Jiangshan
2024-07-11 8:35 ` [PATCH 5/7] workqueue: Remove the argument @cpu_going_down from wq_calc_pod_cpumask() Lai Jiangshan
2024-07-11 8:35 ` [PATCH 6/7] workqueue: Remove the arguments @hotplug_cpu and @online from wq_update_pod() Lai Jiangshan
2024-07-11 8:35 ` [PATCH 7/7] workqueue: Rename wq_update_pod() to unbound_wq_update_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2024-07-11 17:12 ` [PATCH 0/7] Add wq_online_cpumask and remove cpus_read_lock() from apply_wqattrs_lock() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240711083547.3981-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--to=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®