mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xen: fix multicall debug data referencing
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:21:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240718062100.5357-1-jgross@suse.com> (raw)

The recent adding of multicall debug mixed up the referencing of
the debug data. A __percpu tagged pointer can't be initialized with a
plain pointer, so use another percpu variable for the pointer and set
it on each new cpu via a function.

Fixes: 942d917cb92a ("xen: make multicall debug boot time selectable")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407151106.5s7Mnfpz-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
 arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c     |  1 +
 arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h    |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c b/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
index d4cefd8a9af4..10c660fae8b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c
@@ -54,8 +54,9 @@ struct mc_debug_data {
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mc_buffer, mc_buffer);
 static struct mc_debug_data mc_debug_data_early __initdata;
-static struct mc_debug_data __percpu *mc_debug_data __refdata =
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mc_debug_data *, mc_debug_data) =
 	&mc_debug_data_early;
+static struct mc_debug_data __percpu *mc_debug_data_ptr;
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, xen_mc_irq_flags);
 
 static struct static_key mc_debug __ro_after_init;
@@ -70,16 +71,20 @@ static int __init xen_parse_mc_debug(char *arg)
 }
 early_param("xen_mc_debug", xen_parse_mc_debug);
 
+void mc_percpu_init(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	per_cpu(mc_debug_data, cpu) = per_cpu_ptr(mc_debug_data_ptr, cpu);
+}
+
 static int __init mc_debug_enable(void)
 {
-	struct mc_debug_data __percpu *mcdb;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!mc_debug_enabled)
 		return 0;
 
-	mcdb = alloc_percpu(struct mc_debug_data);
-	if (!mcdb) {
+	mc_debug_data_ptr = alloc_percpu(struct mc_debug_data);
+	if (!mc_debug_data_ptr) {
 		pr_err("xen_mc_debug inactive\n");
 		static_key_slow_dec(&mc_debug);
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -88,7 +93,7 @@ static int __init mc_debug_enable(void)
 	/* Be careful when switching to percpu debug data. */
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	xen_mc_flush();
-	mc_debug_data = mcdb;
+	mc_percpu_init(0);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	pr_info("xen_mc_debug active\n");
@@ -150,7 +155,7 @@ void xen_mc_flush(void)
 	trace_xen_mc_flush(b->mcidx, b->argidx, b->cbidx);
 
 	if (static_key_false(&mc_debug)) {
-		mcdb = this_cpu_ptr(mc_debug_data);
+		mcdb = __this_cpu_read(mc_debug_data);
 		memcpy(mcdb->entries, b->entries,
 		       b->mcidx * sizeof(struct multicall_entry));
 	}
@@ -230,7 +235,7 @@ struct multicall_space __xen_mc_entry(size_t args)
 
 	ret.mc = &b->entries[b->mcidx];
 	if (static_key_false(&mc_debug)) {
-		struct mc_debug_data *mcdb = this_cpu_ptr(mc_debug_data);
+		struct mc_debug_data *mcdb = __this_cpu_read(mc_debug_data);
 
 		mcdb->caller[b->mcidx] = __builtin_return_address(0);
 		mcdb->argsz[b->mcidx] = args;
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
index 7ea57f728b89..6863d3da7dec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ static int xen_pv_kick_ap(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
 		return rc;
 
 	xen_pmu_init(cpu);
+	mc_percpu_init(cpu);
 
 	/*
 	 * Why is this a BUG? If the hypercall fails then everything can be
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h b/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h
index e7775dff9452..0cf16fc79e0b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h
@@ -257,6 +257,9 @@ void xen_mc_callback(void (*fn)(void *), void *data);
  */
 struct multicall_space xen_mc_extend_args(unsigned long op, size_t arg_size);
 
+/* Do percpu data initialization for multicalls. */
+void mc_percpu_init(unsigned int cpu);
+
 extern bool is_xen_pmu;
 
 irqreturn_t xen_pmu_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id);
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-07-18  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-18  6:21 Juergen Gross [this message]
2024-07-18 21:56 ` boris.ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240718062100.5357-1-jgross@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®