mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ping Gan <jacky_gam_2001@163.com>
To: hare@suse.de, hch@lst.de
Cc: ping.gan@dell.com, sagi@grimberg.me, kch@nvidia.com,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] nvmet: support unbound_wq for RDMA and TCP
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:07:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240719080723.125046-1-jacky_gam_2001@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f15a932-1a42-4c51-a267-3f765866edc4@suse.de>

> On 7/19/24 07:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 05:14:49PM +0800, Ping Gan wrote:
>>> When running nvmf on SMP platform, current nvme target's RDMA and
>>> TCP use bounded workqueue to handle IO, but when there is other high
>>> workload on the system(eg: kubernetes), the competition between the
>>> bounded kworker and other workload is very radical. To decrease the
>>> resource race of OS among them, this patchset will enable unbounded
>>> workqueue for nvmet-rdma and nvmet-tcp; besides that, it can also
>>> get some performance improvement. And this patchset bases on
>>> previous
>>> discussion from below session.
>> 
>> So why aren't we using unbound workqueues by default?  Who makea the
>> policy decision and how does anyone know which one to chose?
>> 
> I'd be happy to switch to unbound workqueues per default.
> It actually might be a left over from the various workqueue changes;
> at one point 'unbound' meant that effectively only one CPU was used
> for the workqueue, and you had to remove the 'unbound' parameter to
> have the workqueue run on all CPUs. That has since changed, so I guess
> switching to unbound per default is the better option here.

I don't fully understand what you said 'by default'. Did you mean we 
should just remove 'unbounded' parameter and create workqueue by 
WQ_UNBOUND flag or besides that, we should also add other parameter 
to switch 'unbounded' workqueue  to 'bounded' workqueue?

Thanks,
Ping



  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-19  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-17  9:14 Ping Gan
2024-07-17  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nvmet-tcp: add unbound_wq support for nvmet-tcp Ping Gan
2024-07-17 20:28   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-17  9:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvmet-rdma: add unbound_wq support for nvmet-rdma Ping Gan
2024-07-17 20:29   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-19  5:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] nvmet: support unbound_wq for RDMA and TCP Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-19  6:28   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-19  8:07     ` Ping Gan [this message]
2024-07-19  8:26       ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-07-19  8:49         ` Ping Gan
2024-07-21 11:11     ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-07-21 11:09   ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240719080723.125046-1-jacky_gam_2001@163.com \
    --to=jacky_gam_2001@163.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ping.gan@dell.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®