mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86/bugs: Fix handling when srso mitigation is disabled
@ 2024-09-04 15:07 David Kaplan
  2024-09-04 17:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
  2024-09-05  9:47 ` [tip: x86/bugs] x86/bugs: Fix handling when SRSO " tip-bot2 for David Kaplan
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Kaplan @ 2024-09-04 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Borislav Petkov, Peter Zijlstra, Josh Poimboeuf,
	Pawan Gupta, Ingo Molnar, Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin
  Cc: linux-kernel

When the srso mitigation is disabled, either via mitigations=off or
spec_rstack_overflow=off, SBPB should be used instead of IBPB if
possible.  Additionally, move the check earlier in the function so no
warning is printed about the lack of IBPB-enhancing microcode since the
user has turned off the mitigation.

Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 189840db2f8d..10d0775e7aa5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -2557,10 +2557,9 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
 {
 	bool has_microcode = boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE);
 
-	if (cpu_mitigations_off())
-		return;
-
-	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO)) {
+	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO) ||
+	     cpu_mitigations_off() ||
+	     srso_cmd == SRSO_CMD_OFF) {
 		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB))
 			x86_pred_cmd = PRED_CMD_SBPB;
 		return;
@@ -2591,11 +2590,6 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
 	}
 
 	switch (srso_cmd) {
-	case SRSO_CMD_OFF:
-		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB))
-			x86_pred_cmd = PRED_CMD_SBPB;
-		return;
-
 	case SRSO_CMD_MICROCODE:
 		if (has_microcode) {
 			srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_MICROCODE;
@@ -2649,6 +2643,8 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
 			pr_err("WARNING: kernel not compiled with MITIGATION_SRSO.\n");
                 }
 		break;
+	default:
+		break;
 	}
 
 out:
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Fix handling when srso mitigation is disabled
  2024-09-04 15:07 [PATCH] x86/bugs: Fix handling when srso mitigation is disabled David Kaplan
@ 2024-09-04 17:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
  2024-09-05  9:47 ` [tip: x86/bugs] x86/bugs: Fix handling when SRSO " tip-bot2 for David Kaplan
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josh Poimboeuf @ 2024-09-04 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Kaplan
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Borislav Petkov, Peter Zijlstra, Pawan Gupta,
	Ingo Molnar, Dave Hansen, x86, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel

On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:07:11AM -0500, David Kaplan wrote:
> When the srso mitigation is disabled, either via mitigations=off or
> spec_rstack_overflow=off, SBPB should be used instead of IBPB if
> possible.  Additionally, move the check earlier in the function so no
> warning is printed about the lack of IBPB-enhancing microcode since the
> user has turned off the mitigation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 14 +++++---------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index 189840db2f8d..10d0775e7aa5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -2557,10 +2557,9 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
>  {
>  	bool has_microcode = boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE);
>  
> -	if (cpu_mitigations_off())
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO)) {
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO) ||
> +	     cpu_mitigations_off() ||
> +	     srso_cmd == SRSO_CMD_OFF) {

These last two lines should be properly indented by shifting left one
space:

	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO) ||
	    cpu_mitigations_off() ||
	    srso_cmd == SRSO_CMD_OFF) {

Otherwise,

Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

-- 
Josh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [tip: x86/bugs] x86/bugs: Fix handling when SRSO mitigation is disabled
  2024-09-04 15:07 [PATCH] x86/bugs: Fix handling when srso mitigation is disabled David Kaplan
  2024-09-04 17:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
@ 2024-09-05  9:47 ` tip-bot2 for David Kaplan
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for David Kaplan @ 2024-09-05  9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: David Kaplan, Borislav Petkov (AMD), Josh Poimboeuf, x86, linux-kernel

The following commit has been merged into the x86/bugs branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     1dbb6b1495d472806fef1f4c94f5b3e4c89a3c1d
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/1dbb6b1495d472806fef1f4c94f5b3e4c89a3c1d
Author:        David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
AuthorDate:    Wed, 04 Sep 2024 10:07:11 -05:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
CommitterDate: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:20:50 +02:00

x86/bugs: Fix handling when SRSO mitigation is disabled

When the SRSO mitigation is disabled, either via mitigations=off or
spec_rstack_overflow=off, the warning about the lack of IBPB-enhancing
microcode is printed anyway.

This is unnecessary since the user has turned off the mitigation.

  [ bp: Massage, drop SBPB rationale as it doesn't matter because when
    mitigations are disabled x86_pred_cmd is not being used anyway. ]

Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904150711.193022-1-david.kaplan@amd.com
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 189840d..d191542 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -2557,10 +2557,9 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
 {
 	bool has_microcode = boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_BRTYPE);
 
-	if (cpu_mitigations_off())
-		return;
-
-	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO)) {
+	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRSO) ||
+	    cpu_mitigations_off() ||
+	    srso_cmd == SRSO_CMD_OFF) {
 		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB))
 			x86_pred_cmd = PRED_CMD_SBPB;
 		return;
@@ -2591,11 +2590,6 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
 	}
 
 	switch (srso_cmd) {
-	case SRSO_CMD_OFF:
-		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB))
-			x86_pred_cmd = PRED_CMD_SBPB;
-		return;
-
 	case SRSO_CMD_MICROCODE:
 		if (has_microcode) {
 			srso_mitigation = SRSO_MITIGATION_MICROCODE;
@@ -2649,6 +2643,8 @@ static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void)
 			pr_err("WARNING: kernel not compiled with MITIGATION_SRSO.\n");
                 }
 		break;
+	default:
+		break;
 	}
 
 out:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-05  9:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-04 15:07 [PATCH] x86/bugs: Fix handling when srso mitigation is disabled David Kaplan
2024-09-04 17:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-09-05  9:47 ` [tip: x86/bugs] x86/bugs: Fix handling when SRSO " tip-bot2 for David Kaplan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®