From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>,
Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@arm.com>, Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/4] cacheinfo: Check for null last-level cache info
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 23:00:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240905060036.5655-2-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240905060036.5655-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Before determining the validity of the last-level cache info, ensure that
it has been allocated. Simply checking for non-zero cache_leaves() is not
sufficient, as some architectures (e.g., Intel processors) have non-zero
cache_leaves() before allocation.
Dereferencing NULL cacheinfo can occur in update_per_cpu_data_slice_size().
This function iterates over all online CPUs. However, a CPU may have come
online recently, but its cacheinfo may not have been allocated yet.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@suse.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Cc: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
Cc: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@arm.com>
Cc: Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.3+
---
Changes since v5:
* Added Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags from Andreas. Thanks!
Changes since v4:
* Combined checks for per_cpu_cacheinfo() and cache_leaves() in a single
line. (Sudeep)
* Added Reviewed-by tag from Sudeep. Thanks!
Changes since v3:
* Introduced this patch.
Changes since v2:
* N/A
Changes since v1:
* N/A
---
The dereference of a NULL cacheinfo is not observed today because
cache_leaves(cpu) is zero until after init_cache_level() is called
(during the CPU hotplug callback). A subsequent changeset will set
the number of cache leaves earlier and the NULL-pointer dereference
will be observed.
---
drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
index 23b8cba4a2a3..77f2e0f91589 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ bool last_level_cache_is_valid(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cacheinfo *llc;
- if (!cache_leaves(cpu))
+ if (!cache_leaves(cpu) || !per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu))
return false;
llc = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu, cache_leaves(cpu) - 1);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 6:00 [PATCH v6 0/4] x86/cacheinfo: Set the number of leaves per CPU Ricardo Neri
2024-09-05 6:00 ` Ricardo Neri [this message]
2024-09-11 14:05 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] cacheinfo: Check for null last-level cache info Borislav Petkov
2024-09-11 23:37 ` Ricardo Neri
2024-09-12 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-09-05 6:00 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] cacheinfo: Allocate memory during CPU hotplug if not done from the primary CPU Ricardo Neri
2024-09-11 14:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-09-11 23:34 ` Ricardo Neri
2024-09-12 10:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-09-13 4:06 ` Ricardo Neri
2024-09-05 6:00 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] x86/cacheinfo: Delete global num_cache_leaves Ricardo Neri
2024-09-05 6:00 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] x86/cacheinfo: Clean out init_cache_level() Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240905060036.5655-2-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--to=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Pierre.Gondois@arm.com \
--cc=aherrmann@suse.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=rrendec@redhat.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®