From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] KVM: selftests: Precisely mask off dynamic fields in CPUID test
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 16:43:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003234337.273364-3-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003234337.273364-1-seanjc@google.com>
When comparing vCPU CPUID entries against KVM's supported CPUID, mask off
only the dynamic fields/bits instead of skipping the entire entry.
Precisely masking bits isn't meaningfully more difficult than skipping
entire entries, and will be necessary to maintain test coverage when a
future commit enables OSXSAVE by default, i.e. makes one bit in all of
CPUID.0x1 dynamic.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c | 61 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c
index fec03b11b059..f7fdcef5fa59 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c
@@ -12,17 +12,16 @@
#include "kvm_util.h"
#include "processor.h"
-/* CPUIDs known to differ */
-struct {
- u32 function;
- u32 index;
-} mangled_cpuids[] = {
- /*
- * These entries depend on the vCPU's XCR0 register and IA32_XSS MSR,
- * which are not controlled for by this test.
- */
- {.function = 0xd, .index = 0},
- {.function = 0xd, .index = 1},
+struct cpuid_mask {
+ union {
+ struct {
+ u32 eax;
+ u32 ebx;
+ u32 ecx;
+ u32 edx;
+ };
+ u32 regs[4];
+ };
};
static void test_guest_cpuids(struct kvm_cpuid2 *guest_cpuid)
@@ -56,17 +55,23 @@ static void guest_main(struct kvm_cpuid2 *guest_cpuid)
GUEST_DONE();
}
-static bool is_cpuid_mangled(const struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entrie)
+static struct cpuid_mask get_const_cpuid_mask(const struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry)
{
- int i;
+ struct cpuid_mask mask;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mangled_cpuids); i++) {
- if (mangled_cpuids[i].function == entrie->function &&
- mangled_cpuids[i].index == entrie->index)
- return true;
+ memset(&mask, 0xff, sizeof(mask));
+
+ switch (entry->function) {
+ case 0xd:
+ /*
+ * CPUID.0xD.{0,1}.EBX enumerate XSAVE size based on the current
+ * XCR0 and IA32_XSS MSR values.
+ */
+ if (entry->index < 2)
+ mask.ebx = 0;
+ break;
}
-
- return false;
+ return mask;
}
static void compare_cpuids(const struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid1,
@@ -79,6 +84,8 @@ static void compare_cpuids(const struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid1,
"CPUID nent mismatch: %d vs. %d", cpuid1->nent, cpuid2->nent);
for (i = 0; i < cpuid1->nent; i++) {
+ struct cpuid_mask mask;
+
e1 = &cpuid1->entries[i];
e2 = &cpuid2->entries[i];
@@ -88,15 +95,19 @@ static void compare_cpuids(const struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid1,
i, e1->function, e1->index, e1->flags,
e2->function, e2->index, e2->flags);
- if (is_cpuid_mangled(e1))
- continue;
+ /* Mask off dynamic bits, e.g. OSXSAVE, when comparing entries. */
+ mask = get_const_cpuid_mask(e1);
- TEST_ASSERT(e1->eax == e2->eax && e1->ebx == e2->ebx &&
- e1->ecx == e2->ecx && e1->edx == e2->edx,
+ TEST_ASSERT((e1->eax & mask.eax) == (e2->eax & mask.eax) &&
+ (e1->ebx & mask.ebx) == (e2->ebx & mask.ebx) &&
+ (e1->ecx & mask.ecx) == (e2->ecx & mask.ecx) &&
+ (e1->edx & mask.edx) == (e2->edx & mask.edx),
"CPUID 0x%x.%x differ: 0x%x:0x%x:0x%x:0x%x vs 0x%x:0x%x:0x%x:0x%x",
e1->function, e1->index,
- e1->eax, e1->ebx, e1->ecx, e1->edx,
- e2->eax, e2->ebx, e2->ecx, e2->edx);
+ e1->eax & mask.eax, e1->ebx & mask.ebx,
+ e1->ecx & mask.ecx, e1->edx & mask.edx,
+ e2->eax & mask.eax, e2->ebx & mask.ebx,
+ e2->ecx & mask.ecx, e2->edx & mask.edx);
}
}
--
2.47.0.rc0.187.ge670bccf7e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 23:43 [PATCH 00/11] KVM: selftests: AVX support + fixes Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: selftests: Fix out-of-bounds reads in CPUID test's array lookups Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 8:22 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-10-04 9:02 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: selftests: Precisely mask off dynamic fields in CPUID test Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: selftests: Mask off OSPKE and OSXSAVE when comparing CPUID entries Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: selftests: Rework OSXSAVE CR4=>CPUID test to play nice with AVX insns Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: selftests: Configure XCR0 to max supported value by default Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:01 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-04 13:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: selftests: Verify XCR0 can be "downgraded" and "upgraded" Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:04 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual CR4.OSXSAVE enabling from CR4/CPUID sync test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual XCR0 configuration from AMX test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual XCR0 configuration from state test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:10 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual XCR0 configuration from SEV smoke test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: selftests: Ensure KVM supports AVX for SEV-ES VMSA FPU test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-20 11:28 ` [PATCH 00/11] KVM: selftests: AVX support + fixes Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-31 19:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 19:31 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241003234337.273364-3-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®