From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] KVM: selftests: Verify XCR0 can be "downgraded" and "upgraded"
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 16:43:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003234337.273364-7-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003234337.273364-1-seanjc@google.com>
Now that KVM selftests enable all supported XCR0 features by default, add
a testcase to the XCR0 vs. CPUID test to verify that the guest can disable
everything except the legacy FPU in XCR0, and then re-enable the full
feature set, which is kinda sorta what the test did before XCR0 was setup
by default.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c
index a4aecdc77da5..c8a5c5e51661 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xcr0_cpuid_test.c
@@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ static void guest_code(void)
ASSERT_ALL_OR_NONE_XFEATURE(supported_xcr0,
XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE);
+ vector = xsetbv_safe(0, XFEATURE_MASK_FP);
+ __GUEST_ASSERT(!vector,
+ "Expected success on XSETBV(FP), got vector '0x%x'",
+ vector);
+
vector = xsetbv_safe(0, supported_xcr0);
__GUEST_ASSERT(!vector,
"Expected success on XSETBV(0x%lx), got vector '0x%x'",
--
2.47.0.rc0.187.ge670bccf7e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 23:43 [PATCH 00/11] KVM: selftests: AVX support + fixes Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: selftests: Fix out-of-bounds reads in CPUID test's array lookups Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 8:22 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: selftests: Precisely mask off dynamic fields in CPUID test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: selftests: Mask off OSPKE and OSXSAVE when comparing CPUID entries Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: selftests: Rework OSXSAVE CR4=>CPUID test to play nice with AVX insns Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: selftests: Configure XCR0 to max supported value by default Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:01 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-04 13:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 23:43 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-10-04 9:04 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: selftests: Verify XCR0 can be "downgraded" and "upgraded" Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual CR4.OSXSAVE enabling from CR4/CPUID sync test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual XCR0 configuration from AMX test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual XCR0 configuration from state test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:10 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: selftests: Drop manual XCR0 configuration from SEV smoke test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 23:43 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: selftests: Ensure KVM supports AVX for SEV-ES VMSA FPU test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-04 9:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-10-20 11:28 ` [PATCH 00/11] KVM: selftests: AVX support + fixes Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-31 19:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 19:31 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241003234337.273364-7-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®