mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 16:46:25 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241031154424.677253735@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241031151625.361697424@linutronix.de>

The handling of the timer overrun in the signal code is inconsistent as it
takes previous overruns into account. This is just wrong as after the
reprogramming of a timer the overrun count starts over from a clean state,
i.e. 0.

Don't touch info::si_overrun in send_sigqueue() and only store the overrun
value at signal delivery time, which is computed from the timer itself
relative to the expiry time.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
V6: Fold the timer_overrun_to_int() cleanup from Frederic and remove all
    overrun fiddling from the signal path.
---
 kernel/signal.c            |    6 ------
 kernel/time/posix-timers.c |   11 ++++++-----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---

--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1968,15 +1968,9 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
 
 	ret = 0;
 	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
-		/*
-		 * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
-		 * the overrun count.
-		 */
-		q->info.si_overrun++;
 		result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
 		goto out;
 	}
-	q->info.si_overrun = 0;
 
 	signalfd_notify(t, sig);
 	pending = (type != PIDTYPE_PID) ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -233,11 +233,12 @@ static __init int init_posix_timers(void
  * The siginfo si_overrun field and the return value of timer_getoverrun(2)
  * are of type int. Clamp the overrun value to INT_MAX
  */
-static inline int timer_overrun_to_int(struct k_itimer *timr, int baseval)
+static inline int timer_overrun_to_int(struct k_itimer *timr)
 {
-	s64 sum = timr->it_overrun_last + (s64)baseval;
+	if (timr->it_overrun_last > (s64)INT_MAX)
+		return INT_MAX;
 
-	return sum > (s64)INT_MAX ? INT_MAX : (int)sum;
+	return (int)timr->it_overrun_last;
 }
 
 static void common_hrtimer_rearm(struct k_itimer *timr)
@@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct ke
 		timr->it_overrun = -1LL;
 		++timr->it_signal_seq;
 
-		info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, info->si_overrun);
+		info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
 	}
 	ret = true;
 
@@ -774,7 +775,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(timer_getoverrun, timer_
 	if (!timr)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, 0);
+	overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
 	unlock_timer(timr, flags);
 
 	return overrun;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-31 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 01/20] posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 12:26   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-11-01 12:51   ` [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-01 20:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 19:41       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 22:57         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 03/20] posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup the firing logic Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 13:14   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 04/20] posix-cpu-timers: Use dedicated flag for CPU timer nanosleep Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 05/20] posix-timers: Add a refcount to struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 06/20] signal: Split up __sigqueue_alloc() Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 07/20] signal: Provide posixtimer_sigqueue_init() Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 08/20] posix-timers: Store PID type in the timer Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 09/20] signal: Refactor send_sigqueue() Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 10/20] signal: Replace resched_timer logic Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 13:25   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 11/20] posix-timers: Embed sigqueue in struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 12/20] signal: Cleanup unused posix-timer leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 13/20] posix-timers: Move sequence logic into struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 14/20] signal: Provide ignored_posix_timers list Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 15/20] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 13:47   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-01 20:38     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 16/20] signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN) Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 14:04   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 14:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-01 20:47     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 14:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 20:57         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 23:46       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-03  9:44         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-03 19:55           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-02 21:05   ` [patch v6.1 " Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-04 11:42     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-04 15:21       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-04 21:31         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-04 23:02           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 18/20] posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 19/20] alarmtimers: Remove the throttle mechanism from alarm_forward_now() Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 20/20] alarmtimers: Remove return value from alarm functions Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241031154424.677253735@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®