From: Nir Lichtman <nir@lichtman.org>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com, kees@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] exec: remove legacy custom binfmt modules autoloading
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:13:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241116231323.GA225987@lichtman.org> (raw)
Problem: The search binary handler logic contains legacy code
to handle automatically loading kernel modules of unsupported
binary formats.
This logic is a leftover from a.out-to-ELF transition.
After removal of a.out support, this code has no use anymore.
Solution: Clean up this code from the search binary handler,
also remove the line initialising retval to -ENOENT and instead
just return -ENOEXEC if the flow has reached the end of the func.
Note: Anyone who might find future uses for this legacy code
would be better off using binfmt_misc to trigger whatever
module loading they might need - would be more flexible that way.
Suggested-by: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Nir Lichtman <nir@lichtman.org>
---
Side-note: This patch is a follow-up for
the discussion on "exec: make printable macro more concise".
fs/exec.c | 16 +---------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 6c53920795c2..f3975b0636bd 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1723,13 +1723,11 @@ int remove_arg_zero(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_arg_zero);
-#define printable(c) (((c)=='\t') || ((c)=='\n') || (0x20<=(c) && (c)<=0x7e))
/*
* cycle the list of binary formats handler, until one recognizes the image
*/
static int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
- bool need_retry = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES);
struct linux_binfmt *fmt;
int retval;
@@ -1741,8 +1739,6 @@ static int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
if (retval)
return retval;
- retval = -ENOENT;
- retry:
read_lock(&binfmt_lock);
list_for_each_entry(fmt, &formats, lh) {
if (!try_module_get(fmt->module))
@@ -1760,17 +1756,7 @@ static int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
}
read_unlock(&binfmt_lock);
- if (need_retry) {
- if (printable(bprm->buf[0]) && printable(bprm->buf[1]) &&
- printable(bprm->buf[2]) && printable(bprm->buf[3]))
- return retval;
- if (request_module("binfmt-%04x", *(ushort *)(bprm->buf + 2)) < 0)
- return retval;
- need_retry = false;
- goto retry;
- }
-
- return retval;
+ return -ENOEXEC;
}
/* binfmt handlers will call back into begin_new_exec() on success. */
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-16 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-16 23:13 Nir Lichtman [this message]
2024-11-17 4:56 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241116231323.GA225987@lichtman.org \
--to=nir@lichtman.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®