From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org,tglx@linutronix.de,bp@alien8.de,rafael@kernel.org,lenb@kernel.org,dave.jiang@intel.com,irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com,david.e.box@intel.com,Dave
Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] x86/tsc: Remove CPUID "frequency" leaf magic numbers.
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11:53:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241120195338.D035B080@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241120195327.26E06A69@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
All the code that reads the CPUID frequency information leaf hard-codes
a magic number. Give it a symbolic name and use it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
---
b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h | 1 +
b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h~tsc-leaf-checks-3 arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h~tsc-leaf-checks-3 2024-11-20 11:44:19.301730364 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h 2024-11-20 11:44:19.305730518 -0800
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ enum cpuid_regs_idx {
#define CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF 0x5
#define CPUID_DCA_LEAF 0x9
#define CPUID_TSC_LEAF 0x15
+#define CPUID_FREQ_LEAF 0x16
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
extern int have_cpuid_p(void);
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c~tsc-leaf-checks-3 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c~tsc-leaf-checks-3 2024-11-20 11:44:19.305730518 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c 2024-11-20 11:44:19.305730518 -0800
@@ -680,8 +680,8 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
/*
* Denverton SoCs don't report crystal clock, and also don't support
- * CPUID.0x16 for the calculation below, so hardcode the 25MHz crystal
- * clock.
+ * CPUID_FREQ_LEAF for the calculation below, so hardcode the 25MHz
+ * crystal clock.
*/
if (crystal_khz == 0 &&
boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_ATOM_GOLDMONT_D)
@@ -700,10 +700,10 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
* clock, but we can easily calculate it to a high degree of accuracy
* by considering the crystal ratio and the CPU speed.
*/
- if (crystal_khz == 0 && boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= 0x16) {
+ if (crystal_khz == 0 && boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level >= CPUID_FREQ_LEAF) {
unsigned int eax_base_mhz, ebx, ecx, edx;
- cpuid(0x16, &eax_base_mhz, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+ cpuid(CPUID_FREQ_LEAF, &eax_base_mhz, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
crystal_khz = eax_base_mhz * 1000 *
eax_denominator / ebx_numerator;
}
@@ -738,12 +738,12 @@ static unsigned long cpu_khz_from_cpuid(
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
return 0;
- if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level < 0x16)
+ if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level < CPUID_FREQ_LEAF)
return 0;
eax_base_mhz = ebx_max_mhz = ecx_bus_mhz = edx = 0;
- cpuid(0x16, &eax_base_mhz, &ebx_max_mhz, &ecx_bus_mhz, &edx);
+ cpuid(CPUID_FREQ_LEAF, &eax_base_mhz, &ebx_max_mhz, &ecx_bus_mhz, &edx);
return eax_base_mhz * 1000;
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-20 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 19:53 [PATCH 00/11] x86/cpu: Centralize and standardize CPUID leaf naming Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86/cpu: Move MWAIT leaf definition to common header Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 3:20 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/cpu: Use MWAIT leaf definition Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 3:24 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86/cpu: Remove unnecessary MwAIT leaf checks Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/acpi: Check MWAIT feature instead of CPUID level Dave Hansen
2024-11-21 15:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-21 21:46 ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/cpu: Refresh DCA leaf reading code Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:11 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-26 3:55 ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/cpu: Move TSC CPUID leaf definition Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:23 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86/tsc: Move away from TSC leaf magic numbers Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2024-11-26 4:37 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86/tsc: Remove CPUID "frequency" " Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/fpu: Move CPUID leaf definitions to common code Dave Hansen
2024-11-26 4:43 ` Zhao Liu
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86/fpu: Remove unnecessary CPUID level check Dave Hansen
2024-11-21 15:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-22 17:46 ` Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 19:53 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86/cpu: Make all all CPUID leaf names consistent Dave Hansen
2024-11-20 20:23 ` Dave Jiang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-30 21:33 [PATCH 00/11] x86/cpu: Centralize and standardize CPUID leaf naming Dave Hansen
2024-10-30 21:33 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86/tsc: Remove CPUID "frequency" leaf magic numbers Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241120195338.D035B080@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®