From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 2/2] rcu/nocb: Fix rcuog wake-up from offline softirq
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:42:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241212184214.2018411-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0daba35-f647-40cd-b556-3a04e03da93c@paulmck-laptop>
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
After a CPU has set itself offline and before it eventually calls
rcutree_report_cpu_dead(), there are still opportunities for callbacks
to be enqueued, for example from an IRQ. When that happens on NOCB, the
rcuog wake-up is deferred through an IPI to an online CPU in order not
to call into the scheduler and risk arming the RT-bandwidth after
hrtimers have been migrated out and disabled.
But performing a synchronized IPI from an IRQ is buggy as reported in
the following scenario:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 26 at kernel/smp.c:633 smp_call_function_single
Modules linked in: rcutorture torture
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 26 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc1-00012-g9139f93209d1 #1
Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x320 <- __stop_cpus+0xd0/0x120
RIP: 0010:smp_call_function_single
<IRQ>
swake_up_one_online
__call_rcu_nocb_wake
__call_rcu_common
? rcu_torture_one_read
call_timer_fn
__run_timers
run_timer_softirq
handle_softirqs
irq_exit_rcu
? tick_handle_periodic
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
</IRQ>
The periodic tick must be shutdown when the CPU is offline, just like is
done for oneshot tick. This must be fixed but this is not enough:
softirqs can happen on any hardirq tail and reproduce the above scenario.
Fix this with introducing a special deferred rcuog wake up mode when the
CPU is offline. This deferred wake up doesn't arm any timer and simply
wait for rcu_report_cpu_dead() to be called in order to flush any
pending rcuog wake up.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409231644.4c55582d-lkp@intel.com
Fixes: 9139f93209d1 ("rcu/nocb: Fix RT throttling hrtimer armed from offline CPU")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 1 +
kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index a9a811d9d7a37..7ed060edd12b1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
#define RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY 2
#define RCU_NOCB_WAKE 3
#define RCU_NOCB_WAKE_FORCE 4
+#define RCU_NOCB_WAKE_OFFLINE 5
#define RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS (1 + (HZ > 250) + (HZ > 500))
/* For jiffies_till_first_fqs and */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 0923d60c5a338..78841346e1c13 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ static void wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
case RCU_NOCB_WAKE_FORCE:
if (rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup < RCU_NOCB_WAKE)
mod_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer, jiffies + 1);
+ fallthrough;
+ case RCU_NOCB_WAKE_OFFLINE:
if (rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup < waketype)
WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, waketype);
break;
@@ -562,8 +564,16 @@ static void __call_rcu_nocb_wake(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool was_alldone,
lazy_len = READ_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len);
if (was_alldone) {
rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = len;
- // Only lazy CBs in bypass list
- if (lazy_len && bypass_len == lazy_len) {
+ if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu)) {
+ /*
+ * Offline CPUs can't call swake_up_one_online() from IRQs. Rely
+ * on the final deferred wake-up rcutree_report_cpu_dead()
+ */
+ rcu_nocb_unlock(rdp);
+ wake_nocb_gp_defer(rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_OFFLINE,
+ TPS("WakeEmptyIsDeferredOffline"));
+ } else if (lazy_len && bypass_len == lazy_len) {
+ // Only lazy CBs in bypass list
rcu_nocb_unlock(rdp);
wake_nocb_gp_defer(rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY,
TPS("WakeLazy"));
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 18:42 [PATCH rcu 0/2] No-CB changes for v6.14 Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:42 ` [PATCH rcu 1/2] rcu/nocb: Use switch/case on NOCB timer state machine Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-13 23:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-13 23:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-14 16:20 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-12-12 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2024-12-13 23:07 ` [PATCH rcu 2/2] rcu/nocb: Fix rcuog wake-up from offline softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-14 16:16 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241212184214.2018411-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®