From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, paulmck@kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, frederic@kernel.org,
ankur.a.arora@oracle.com, efault@gmx.de, sshegde@linux.ibm.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] RCU changes for PREEMPT_LAZY
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 20:06:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241213040658.2282640-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> (raw)
This series adds RCU bits for lazy preemption.
The problem addressed is that pre-PREEMPT_LAZY, PREEMPTION=y implied
PREEMPT_RCU=y. With PREEMPT_LAZY, that's no longer true.
That's because PREEMPT_RCU makes some trade-offs to optimize for
latency as opposed to throughput, and configurations with limited
preemption might prefer the stronger forward-progress guarantees of
PREEMPT_RCU=n.
Accordingly, with standalone PREEMPT_LAZY (much like PREEMPT_NONE,
PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY) we want to use PREEMPT_RCU=n. And, when used in
conjunction with PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, we continue to use PREEMPT_RCU=y.
Patches 1-3 are cleanup patches:
"rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs()"
"rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY"
"sched: update __cond_resched comment about RCU quiescent states"
Patch 4,
"rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict()"
handles a latent RCU bug rcu_report_qs_rdp() could be called with
an unstable rdp.
Patches 5 and 6,
"rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y"
"osnoise: provide quiescent states"
handle quiescent states for the (PREEMPT_LAZY=y, PREEMPT_RCU=n)
configuration.
And, finally patch 7, "rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations",
explicitly limits PREEMPT_RCU=y to the PREEMPT_DYNAMIC or the latency
oriented models.
Changelog:
v3:
- moved patch-3 to be the last one in the series (suggested by Sebastian)
- added "rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict()"
(suggested by Frederic Weisbecker).
- switched to a more robust check in rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq()
(suggested by Frederic Weisbecker).
- simplified check in osnoise (suggested by Frederic Weisbecker).
- dropped an unrelated scheduler patch.
v2:
- fixup incorrect usage of tif_need_resched_lazy() (comment from
from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
- massaged the commit messages a bit
- drops the powerpc support for PREEMPT_LAZY as that was orthogonal
to this series (Shrikanth will send that out separately.)
Please review.
Ankur Arora (7):
rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs()
rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY
sched: update __cond_resched comment about RCU quiescent states
rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict()
rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y
osnoise: provide quiescent states
rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +-
include/linux/rcutree.h | 2 +-
include/linux/srcutiny.h | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 4 ++--
kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 14 +++++++-------
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +++-
kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
2.43.5
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-13 4:06 Ankur Arora [this message]
2024-12-13 4:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs() Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 4:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 4:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] sched: update __cond_resched comment about RCU quiescent states Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 13:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-13 4:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] rcu: handle unstable rdp in rcu_read_unlock_strict() Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 13:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-13 4:06 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 13:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-13 20:44 ` Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 4:06 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] osnoise: provide quiescent states Ankur Arora
2024-12-13 14:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-12-13 4:06 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations Ankur Arora
2025-01-08 1:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] RCU changes for PREEMPT_LAZY Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-08 18:18 ` Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241213040658.2282640-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®