mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gur Stavi <gur.stavi@huawei.com>
To: <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <cai.huoqing@linux.dev>,
	<corbet@lwn.net>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>,
	<gongfan1@huawei.com>, <guoxin09@huawei.com>,
	<gur.stavi@huawei.com>, <helgaas@kernel.org>, <horms@kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<meny.yossefi@huawei.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <shenchenyang1@hisilicon.com>,
	<shijing34@huawei.com>, <wulike1@huawei.com>,
	<zhoushuai28@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v01 1/1] hinic3: module initialization and tx/rx logic
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:14:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241230141435.2817079-1-gur.stavi@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241227103134.21168df3@kernel.org>

> > > I understand. But I'm concerned about the self-assured tone of the
> > > "it's not supported" message, that's very corporate verbiage. Annotating
> > > endian is standard practice of writing upstream drivers. It makes me
> > > doubt if you have any developers with upstream experience on your team
> > > if you don't know that. That and the fact that Huawei usually tops
> > > the list of net-negative review contributors in netdev.
> >
> > The most popular combination in the last 3 decades was little endian
> > CPUs with big endian device interfaces. Endianity conversion was a
> > necessity and therefore endian annotation became standard practice.
> > But it was never symmetric, conversion to/from BE was more common than
> > conversion to/from LE.
> >
> > As the pendulum moved from horizontal market to vertical market and major
> > companies started to develop both hw and sw, the hw engineers transformed
> > proprietary parts of the interface to little endian to save extra work in
> > the sw. AWS did it. Azure did it. Huawei did it. These vertical companies
> > do not care about endianity of CPUs they do not use.
> > This is not "corporate verbiage" this is a real market shift.
>
> Don't misquote me. You did it in your previous reply, now you're doing
> it again.
>
> If you don't understand what I'm saying you can ask for clarifications.
>

We studied previous submissions and followed their example.
Were the maintainers wrong to approve Amazon and Microsoft drivers?

I don't understand what the problem is. Please clarify.

> > The necessity for endian conversion is gone (or just halved). Will the
> > standard practice remain? There is not a single __le annotation in Amazon
> > and Microsoft code. Not in Mellanox code either. Maybe their hw is fully
> > BE (have to wonder about their DPUs). Amazingly, Intel that only creates
> > little endian CPUs has lots of __le annotations. But they are the flag
> > barer of horizontal market.
> >
> > Interesting how both Amazon and Microsoft started with:
> > depends on X86
> > Thus evaded demand for adding __le annotations to the code.
> > Later, both sneaked in quiet small patches with replacement to:
> > depends on !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> > Maybe that is the true meaning of "upstream experience".


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-30 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-19  9:21 [PATCH net-next v01 0/1] net: hinic3: Add a driver for Huawei 3rd gen NIC Gur Stavi
2024-12-19  9:21 ` [PATCH net-next v01 1/1] hinic3: module initialization and tx/rx logic Gur Stavi
2024-12-20 21:24   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-22  8:12     ` Gur Stavi
2024-12-23 15:39       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-25 12:56         ` Gur Stavi
2024-12-27 18:31           ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-30 14:14             ` Gur Stavi [this message]
2024-12-31  3:23               ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-01  6:49                 ` Gur Stavi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241230141435.2817079-1-gur.stavi@huawei.com \
    --to=gur.stavi@huawei.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=cai.huoqing@linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gongfan1@huawei.com \
    --cc=guoxin09@huawei.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=meny.yossefi@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shenchenyang1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=shijing34@huawei.com \
    --cc=wulike1@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhoushuai28@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®