* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:42 [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-12-30 17:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-30 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-12-30 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/30/24 07:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.123 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.123-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:42 [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-30 17:39 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-12-30 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
2024-12-30 20:59 ` Shuah Khan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-12-30 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 683 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.123 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here (obsvx2 target is down):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:42 [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-30 17:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-30 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-12-30 20:59 ` Shuah Khan
2024-12-31 8:23 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-12-30 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 12/30/24 08:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.123 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.123-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:42 [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-30 20:59 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-12-31 8:23 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-12-31 9:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-12-31 8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: Usama.Anjum, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/30/24 8:42 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.123 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.123-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
OVERVIEW
Builds: 30 passed, 0 failed
Boot tests: 513 passed, 0 failed
CI systems: broonie, maestro
REVISION
Commit
name: v6.1.122-61-g519f5e9fdadee
hash: 519f5e9fdadee615a2a0e2f03840ddc2c938c9c4
Checked out from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
BUILDS
No build failures found
BOOT TESTS
No boot failures found
See complete and up-to-date report at:
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=519f5e9fdadee615a2a0e2f03840ddc2c938c9c4&var-patchset_hash=
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
KernelCI team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:42 [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-31 8:23 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2024-12-31 9:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-12-31 22:38 ` [PATCH 6.1] " Hardik Garg
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-12-31 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 at 21:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.123 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.123-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.123-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 519f5e9fdadee615a2a0e2f03840ddc2c938c9c4
* git describe: v6.1.122-61-g519f5e9fdade
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.122-61-g519f5e9fdade
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.121-84-g7823105d258c)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.121-84-g7823105d258c)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.121-84-g7823105d258c)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.121-84-g7823105d258c)
## Test result summary
total: 113502, pass: 88713, fail: 4842, skip: 19868, xfail: 79
## Build Summary
* arc: 6 total, 5 passed, 1 failed
* arm: 138 total, 138 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 42 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 31 total, 27 passed, 4 failed
* mips: 30 total, 25 passed, 5 failed
* parisc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 33 passed, 3 failed
* riscv: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 18 total, 17 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 12 total, 10 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 8 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1] 6.1.123-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:42 [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-31 9:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-12-31 22:38 ` Hardik Garg
2024-12-31 23:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 00/60] " Ron Economos
2025-01-02 10:42 ` Pavel Machek
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2024-12-31 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh,
linux-kernel, linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel,
rwarsow, shuah, srw, stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, amd kselftest tool builds fine for v6.1.123-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:42 [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-31 22:38 ` [PATCH 6.1] " Hardik Garg
@ 2024-12-31 23:00 ` Ron Economos
2025-01-02 10:42 ` Pavel Machek
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-12-31 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/30/24 07:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.123 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:41:48 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.123-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review
2024-12-30 15:42 [PATCH 6.1 00/60] 6.1.123-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-31 23:00 ` [PATCH 6.1 00/60] " Ron Economos
@ 2025-01-02 10:42 ` Pavel Machek
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2025-01-02 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, dan.carpenter
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 634 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.123 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> mtd: rawnand: fix double free in atmel_pmecc_create_user()
This is wrong for 6.1 and older -- we don't use devm_kzalloc there, so
it creates memory leak.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread