From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: mkoutny@suse.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, surenb@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
lkp@intel.com, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 2/4] sched: Don't account irq time if sched_clock_irqtime is disabled
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 10:24:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250103022409.2544-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250103022409.2544-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
sched_clock_irqtime may be disabled due to the clock source, in which case
IRQ time should not be accounted. Let's add a conditional check to avoid
unnecessary logic.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 84902936a620..22dfcd3e92ed 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -740,29 +740,31 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
s64 __maybe_unused steal = 0, irq_delta = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
- irq_delta = irq_time_read(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
+ if (irqtime_enabled()) {
+ irq_delta = irq_time_read(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
- /*
- * Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
- * this case when a previous update_rq_clock() happened inside a
- * {soft,}IRQ region.
- *
- * When this happens, we stop ->clock_task and only update the
- * prev_irq_time stamp to account for the part that fit, so that a next
- * update will consume the rest. This ensures ->clock_task is
- * monotonic.
- *
- * It does however cause some slight miss-attribution of {soft,}IRQ
- * time, a more accurate solution would be to update the irq_time using
- * the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
- * atomic ops.
- */
- if (irq_delta > delta)
- irq_delta = delta;
+ /*
+ * Since irq_time is only updated on {soft,}irq_exit, we might run into
+ * this case when a previous update_rq_clock() happened inside a
+ * {soft,}IRQ region.
+ *
+ * When this happens, we stop ->clock_task and only update the
+ * prev_irq_time stamp to account for the part that fit, so that a next
+ * update will consume the rest. This ensures ->clock_task is
+ * monotonic.
+ *
+ * It does however cause some slight miss-attribution of {soft,}IRQ
+ * time, a more accurate solution would be to update the irq_time using
+ * the current rq->clock timestamp, except that would require using
+ * atomic ops.
+ */
+ if (irq_delta > delta)
+ irq_delta = delta;
- rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
- delta -= irq_delta;
- delayacct_irq(rq->curr, irq_delta);
+ rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
+ delta -= irq_delta;
+ delayacct_irq(rq->curr, irq_delta);
+ }
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
if (static_key_false((¶virt_steal_rq_enabled))) {
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-03 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-03 2:24 [PATCH v8 resend 0/4] sched: Fix missing irq time when CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is enabled Yafang Shao
2025-01-03 2:24 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] sched: Define sched_clock_irqtime as static key Yafang Shao
2025-01-03 13:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-01-15 9:17 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Yafang Shao
2025-01-03 2:24 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2025-01-03 13:32 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] sched: Don't account irq time if sched_clock_irqtime is disabled Vincent Guittot
2025-01-15 9:17 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Yafang Shao
2025-01-03 2:24 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] sched, psi: " Yafang Shao
2025-01-15 9:17 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Yafang Shao
2025-01-03 2:24 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] sched: Fix cgroup irq time for CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING Yafang Shao
2025-01-09 10:46 ` Michal Koutný
2025-01-09 13:46 ` Yafang Shao
2025-01-14 15:48 ` Michal Koutný
2025-01-15 2:58 ` Yafang Shao
2025-01-10 3:04 ` kernel test robot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-22 2:47 [PATCH v8 0/4] sched: Fix missing irq time when CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is enabled Yafang Shao
2024-12-22 2:47 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] sched: Don't account irq time if sched_clock_irqtime is disabled Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250103022409.2544-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®