mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
	 Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/14] btrfs: selftests: don't split RAID extents in half
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:47:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107-rst-delete-fixes-v2-10-0c7b14c0aac2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107-rst-delete-fixes-v2-0-0c7b14c0aac2@kernel.org>

From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>

The selftests for partially deleting the start or tail of RAID
stripe-extents split these extents in half.

This can hide errors in the calculation, so don't split the RAID
stripe-extents in half but delete the first or last 16K of the 64K
extents.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
index 19f6147a38a54f6fe581264a971542840bc61180..12f3dbb23a6423c4d224c5b087b35862b8d643db 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
 #define RST_TEST_NUM_DEVICES	(2)
 #define RST_TEST_RAID1_TYPE	(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1)
 
+#define SZ_48K (SZ_32K + SZ_16K)
+
 typedef int (*test_func_t)(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans);
 
 static struct btrfs_device *btrfs_device_by_devid(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
@@ -94,32 +96,32 @@ static int test_front_delete(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = btrfs_delete_raid_extent(trans, logical, SZ_32K);
+	ret = btrfs_delete_raid_extent(trans, logical, SZ_16K);
 	if (ret) {
 		test_err("deleting RAID extent [%llu, %llu] failed", logical,
-			 logical + SZ_32K);
+			 logical + SZ_16K);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	len = SZ_32K;
-	ret = btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset(fs_info, logical + SZ_32K, &len,
+	len -= SZ_16K;
+	ret = btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset(fs_info, logical + SZ_16K, &len,
 					   map_type, 0, &io_stripe);
 	if (ret) {
 		test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] failed",
-			 logical + SZ_32K, logical + SZ_32K + len);
+			 logical + SZ_16K, logical + SZ_64K);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (io_stripe.physical != logical + SZ_32K) {
+	if (io_stripe.physical != logical + SZ_16K) {
 		test_err("invalid physical address, expected %llu, got %llu",
-			 logical + SZ_32K, io_stripe.physical);
+			 logical + SZ_16K, io_stripe.physical);
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (len != SZ_32K) {
+	if (len != SZ_48K) {
 		test_err("invalid stripe length, expected %llu, got %llu",
-			 (u64)SZ_32K, len);
+			 (u64)SZ_48K, len);
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -128,11 +130,11 @@ static int test_front_delete(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
 	if (ret != -ENODATA) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] succeeded, should fail",
-			 logical, logical + SZ_32K);
+			 logical, logical + SZ_16K);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = btrfs_delete_raid_extent(trans, logical + SZ_32K, SZ_32K);
+	ret = btrfs_delete_raid_extent(trans, logical + SZ_16K, SZ_48K);
 out:
 	btrfs_put_bioc(bioc);
 	return ret;
@@ -209,14 +211,14 @@ static int test_tail_delete(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = btrfs_delete_raid_extent(trans, logical + SZ_32K, SZ_32K);
+	ret = btrfs_delete_raid_extent(trans, logical + SZ_48K, SZ_16K);
 	if (ret) {
 		test_err("deleting RAID extent [%llu, %llu] failed",
-			 logical + SZ_32K, logical + SZ_64K);
+			 logical + SZ_48K, logical + SZ_64K);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	len = SZ_32K;
+	len = SZ_48K;
 	ret = btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset(fs_info, logical, &len, map_type, 0, &io_stripe);
 	if (ret) {
 		test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] failed", logical,
@@ -231,9 +233,19 @@ static int test_tail_delete(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (len != SZ_32K) {
+	if (len != SZ_48K) {
 		test_err("invalid stripe length, expected %llu, got %llu",
-			 (u64)SZ_32K, len);
+			 (u64)SZ_48K, len);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	len = SZ_16K;
+	ret = btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset(fs_info, logical + SZ_48K, &len,
+					   map_type, 0, &io_stripe);
+	if (ret != -ENODATA) {
+		test_err("lookup of RAID extent [%llu, %llu] succeeded should fail",
+			 logical + SZ_48K, logical + SZ_64K);
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}

-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-07 12:47 [PATCH v2 00/14] btrfs: more RST delete fixes Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] btrfs: don't try to delete RAID stripe-extents if we don't need to Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 10:37   ` David Sterba
2025-01-09 12:35   ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-09 14:39     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:14       ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-09 15:27         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-10 11:29           ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] btrfs: assert RAID stripe-extent length is always greater than 0 Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] btrfs: fix search when deleting a RAID stripe-extent Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 10:42   ` David Sterba
2025-01-09 12:42   ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-09 14:13     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] btrfs: fix front delete range calculation for RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] btrfs: fix tail delete of RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 12:45   ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] btrfs: fix deletion of a range spanning parts two RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:24   ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-10 11:33     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-10 16:20       ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] btrfs: implement hole punching for " Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:32   ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] btrfs: don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe on RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 10:50   ` David Sterba
2025-01-09 15:44   ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-09 16:00     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] btrfs: selftests: check for correct return value of failed lookup Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] btrfs: selftests: test RAID stripe-tree deletion spanning two items Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] btrfs: selftests: add selftest for punching holes into the RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:50   ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] btrfs: selftests: add test for punching a hole into 3 RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] btrfs: selftests: add a selftest for deleting two out of three extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] btrfs: more RST delete fixes David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250107-rst-delete-fixes-v2-10-0c7b14c0aac2@kernel.org \
    --to=jth@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®