From: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/14] btrfs: don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe on RAID stripe-extents
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:47:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107-rst-delete-fixes-v2-8-0c7b14c0aac2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250107-rst-delete-fixes-v2-0-0c7b14c0aac2@kernel.org>
From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe() to modify the keys in the RAID
stripe-tree as this can lead to corruption of the tree, which is caught by
the checks in btrfs_set_item_key_safe():
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): leaf 49168384 gen 15 total ptrs 194 free space 8329 owner 12
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): refs 2 lock_owner 1030 current 1030
[ snip ]
item 105 key (354549760 230 20480) itemoff 14587 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 5 physical 67502080
item 106 key (354631680 230 4096) itemoff 14571 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 1 physical 88559616
item 107 key (354631680 230 32768) itemoff 14555 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 1 physical 88555520
item 108 key (354717696 230 28672) itemoff 14539 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 2 physical 67604480
[ snip ]
BTRFS critical (device nvme1n1): slot 106 key (354631680 230 32768) new key (354635776 230 4096)
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2602!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1055 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1+ #1464
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
Code: <snip>
RSP: 0018:ffffc90001337ab0 EFLAGS: 00010287
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881115fd000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
RBP: ffff888110ed6f50 R08: 00000000ffffefff R09: ffffffff8244c500
R10: 00000000ffffefff R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: ffff888100586000
R13: 00000000000000c9 R14: ffffc90001337b1f R15: ffff888110f23b58
FS: 00007f7d75c72740(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fa811652c60 CR3: 0000000111398001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x1a
? die+0x2e/0x50
? do_trap+0xca/0x110
? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80
? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70
? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent+0xc4/0xe0
btrfs_delete_raid_extent+0x227/0x240
__btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0x57f/0x9c0
? exc_coproc_segment_overrun+0x40/0x40
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2fa/0xe80
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x81/0xe0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x2dd/0xbe0
? preempt_count_add+0x52/0xb0
btrfs_sync_file+0x375/0x4c0
do_fsync+0x39/0x70
__x64_sys_fsync+0x13/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x54/0x110
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f7d7550ef90
Code: <snip>
RSP: 002b:00007ffd70237248 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f7d7550ef90
RDX: 000000000000013a RSI: 000000000040eb28 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000000001b R08: 0000000000000078 R09: 00007ffd7023725c
R10: 00007f7d75400390 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 028f5c28f5c28f5c
R13: 8f5c28f5c28f5c29 R14: 000000000040b520 R15: 00007f7d75c726c8
</TASK>
Instead copy the item, adjust the key and per-device physical addresses
and re-insert it into the tree.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
---
fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c
index d15df49c61a86a4188b822b05453428e444920b5..a4225ad043216e5d7035a71eab6bcc49b242836f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c
@@ -13,12 +13,13 @@
#include "volumes.h"
#include "print-tree.h"
-static void btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+static int btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_path *path,
const struct btrfs_key *oldkey,
u64 newlen, u64 frontpad)
{
- struct btrfs_stripe_extent *extent;
+ struct btrfs_root *stripe_root = trans->fs_info->stripe_root;
+ struct btrfs_stripe_extent *extent, *new;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
int slot;
size_t item_size;
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static void btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
.type = BTRFS_RAID_STRIPE_KEY,
.offset = newlen,
};
+ int ret;
ASSERT(newlen > 0);
ASSERT(oldkey->type == BTRFS_RAID_STRIPE_KEY);
@@ -34,17 +36,31 @@ static void btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
leaf = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
item_size = btrfs_item_size(leaf, slot);
+
+ new = kzalloc(item_size, GFP_NOFS);
+ if (!new)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
extent = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_stripe_extent);
for (int i = 0; i < btrfs_num_raid_stripes(item_size); i++) {
struct btrfs_raid_stride *stride = &extent->strides[i];
u64 phys;
- phys = btrfs_raid_stride_physical(leaf, stride);
- btrfs_set_raid_stride_physical(leaf, stride, phys + frontpad);
+ phys = btrfs_raid_stride_physical(leaf, stride) + frontpad;
+ btrfs_set_stack_raid_stride_physical(&new->strides[i], phys);
}
- btrfs_set_item_key_safe(trans, path, &newkey);
+ ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, stripe_root, path);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
+ btrfs_release_path(path);
+ ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, stripe_root, &newkey, new, item_size);
+
+out:
+ kfree(new);
+ return ret;
}
int btrfs_delete_raid_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 start, u64 length)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 12:47 [PATCH v2 00/14] btrfs: more RST delete fixes Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] btrfs: don't try to delete RAID stripe-extents if we don't need to Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 10:37 ` David Sterba
2025-01-09 12:35 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-09 14:39 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:14 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-09 15:27 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-10 11:29 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] btrfs: assert RAID stripe-extent length is always greater than 0 Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] btrfs: fix search when deleting a RAID stripe-extent Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 10:42 ` David Sterba
2025-01-09 12:42 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-09 14:13 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] btrfs: fix front delete range calculation for RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] btrfs: fix tail delete of RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 12:45 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] btrfs: fix deletion of a range spanning parts two RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:24 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-10 11:33 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-10 16:20 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] btrfs: implement hole punching for " Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:32 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-07 12:47 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2025-01-09 10:50 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] btrfs: don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe on RAID stripe-extents David Sterba
2025-01-09 15:44 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-09 16:00 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] btrfs: selftests: check for correct return value of failed lookup Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] btrfs: selftests: don't split RAID extents in half Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] btrfs: selftests: test RAID stripe-tree deletion spanning two items Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] btrfs: selftests: add selftest for punching holes into the RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:50 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] btrfs: selftests: add test for punching a hole into 3 RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 12:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] btrfs: selftests: add a selftest for deleting two out of three extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-07 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] btrfs: more RST delete fixes David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250107-rst-delete-fixes-v2-8-0c7b14c0aac2@kernel.org \
--to=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®