mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/14] btrfs: selftests: correct RAID stripe-tree feature flag setting
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:15:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250109-rst-delete-fixes-v3-1-b5c73a4b2a80@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250109-rst-delete-fixes-v3-0-b5c73a4b2a80@kernel.org>

From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>

RAID stripe-tree is an incompatible feature not a read-only compatible, so
set the incompat flag not a compat_ro one in the selftest code.

Subsequent changes in btrfs_delete_raid_extent() will start checking for
this flag.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
index 30f17eb7b6a8a1dfa9f66ed5508da42a70db1fa3..2e8083f1d0d184a23317facbb566ef949639a8a7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int run_test(test_func_t test, u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
 		ret = PTR_ERR(root);
 		goto out;
 	}
-	btrfs_set_super_compat_ro_flags(root->fs_info->super_copy,
+	btrfs_set_super_incompat_flags(root->fs_info->super_copy,
 					BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID_STRIPE_TREE);
 	root->root_key.objectid = BTRFS_RAID_STRIPE_TREE_OBJECTID;
 	root->root_key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;

-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-09 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-09 15:15 [PATCH v3 00/14] btrfs: more RST delete fixes Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2025-01-09 15:31   ` [PATCH v3 01/14] btrfs: selftests: correct RAID stripe-tree feature flag setting Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] btrfs: don't try to delete RAID stripe-extents if we don't need to Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] btrfs: assert RAID stripe-extent length is always greater than 0 Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] btrfs: fix front delete range calculation for RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] btrfs: fix tail delete of RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] btrfs: fix deletion of a range spanning parts two RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] btrfs: implement hole punching for " Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] btrfs: don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe on RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] btrfs: selftests: check for correct return value of failed lookup Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] btrfs: selftests: don't split RAID extents in half Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] btrfs: selftests: test RAID stripe-tree deletion spanning two items Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] btrfs: selftests: add selftest for punching holes into the RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] btrfs: selftests: add test for punching a hole into 3 RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] btrfs: selftests: add a selftest for deleting two out of three extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] btrfs: more RST delete fixes Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250109-rst-delete-fixes-v3-1-b5c73a4b2a80@kernel.org \
    --to=jth@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®