From: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/14] btrfs: don't try to delete RAID stripe-extents if we don't need to
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:15:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250109-rst-delete-fixes-v3-2-b5c73a4b2a80@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250109-rst-delete-fixes-v3-0-b5c73a4b2a80@kernel.org>
From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Even if the RAID stripe-tree is not enabled in the filesystem,
do_free_extent_accounting() still calls into btrfs_delete_raid_extent().
Check if the extent in question is on a block-group that has a profile
which is used by RAID stripe-tree before attempting to delete a stripe
extent. Return early if it doesn't, otherwise we're doing a unnecessary
search.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c
index 0bf3c032d9dc43eefe158e430813add9292c577e..be923144cc85a0ecb370dbb1ebeea44269a1f4ad 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/raid-stripe-tree.c
@@ -59,9 +59,22 @@ int btrfs_delete_raid_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 start, u64 le
int slot;
int ret;
- if (!stripe_root)
+ if (!btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, RAID_STRIPE_TREE) || !stripe_root)
return 0;
+ if (!btrfs_is_testing(fs_info)) {
+ struct btrfs_chunk_map *map;
+ bool use_rst;
+
+ map = btrfs_find_chunk_map(fs_info, start, length);
+ if (!map)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ use_rst = btrfs_need_stripe_tree_update(fs_info, map->type);
+ btrfs_free_chunk_map(map);
+ if (!use_rst)
+ return 0;
+ }
+
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
index 2e8083f1d0d184a23317facbb566ef949639a8a7..f060c04c7f76357e6d2c6ba78a8ba981e35645bd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/raid-stripe-tree-tests.c
@@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ static int run_test(test_func_t test, u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
}
btrfs_set_super_incompat_flags(root->fs_info->super_copy,
BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RAID_STRIPE_TREE);
+ btrfs_set_fs_incompat(root->fs_info, RAID_STRIPE_TREE);
root->root_key.objectid = BTRFS_RAID_STRIPE_TREE_OBJECTID;
root->root_key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
root->root_key.offset = 0;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-09 15:15 [PATCH v3 00/14] btrfs: more RST delete fixes Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] btrfs: selftests: correct RAID stripe-tree feature flag setting Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:31 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] btrfs: assert RAID stripe-extent length is always greater than 0 Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] btrfs: fix front delete range calculation for RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] btrfs: fix tail delete of RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] btrfs: fix deletion of a range spanning parts two RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] btrfs: implement hole punching for " Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] btrfs: don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe on RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] btrfs: selftests: check for correct return value of failed lookup Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] btrfs: selftests: don't split RAID extents in half Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] btrfs: selftests: test RAID stripe-tree deletion spanning two items Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] btrfs: selftests: add selftest for punching holes into the RAID stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] btrfs: selftests: add test for punching a hole into 3 RAID stripe-extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] btrfs: selftests: add a selftest for deleting two out of three extents Johannes Thumshirn
2025-01-09 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] btrfs: more RST delete fixes Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250109-rst-delete-fixes-v3-2-b5c73a4b2a80@kernel.org \
--to=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®