* [PATCH] kernel/sysctl-test: Fix potential null dereference in sysctl-test
@ 2025-01-10 10:07 Charles Han
2025-01-11 12:24 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-13 13:47 ` Joel Granados
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Charles Han @ 2025-01-10 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kees, joel.granados, logang, mcgrof, yzaikin, gregkh, brendan.higgins
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, Charles Han
kunit_kzalloc() may return a NULL pointer, dereferencing it without
NULL check may lead to NULL dereference.
Add a NULL check for buffer.
Fixes: 2cb80dbbbaba ("kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec()")
Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
---
kernel/sysctl-test.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl-test.c b/kernel/sysctl-test.c
index 3ac98bb7fb82..8c13bcff0127 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl-test.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl-test.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test)
*/
void __user *buffer = (void __user *)kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(int),
GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
size_t len;
loff_t pos;
@@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_maxlen_unset(struct kunit *test)
};
void __user *buffer = (void __user *)kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(int),
GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
size_t len;
loff_t pos;
@@ -124,6 +126,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_len_is_zero(struct kunit *test)
};
void __user *buffer = (void __user *)kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(int),
GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
/*
* However, now our read/write buffer has zero length.
*/
@@ -158,6 +161,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_read_but_position_set(
};
void __user *buffer = (void __user *)kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(int),
GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
/*
* We don't care about our buffer length because we start off with a
* non-zero file position.
@@ -194,6 +198,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test)
size_t len = 4;
loff_t pos = 0;
char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, len, GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
char __user *user_buffer = (char __user *)buffer;
/* Store 13 in the data field. */
*((int *)table.data) = 13;
@@ -225,6 +230,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test)
size_t len = 5;
loff_t pos = 0;
char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, len, GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
char __user *user_buffer = (char __user *)buffer;
*((int *)table.data) = -16;
@@ -255,6 +261,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test)
size_t len = sizeof(input) - 1;
loff_t pos = 0;
char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, len, GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
char __user *user_buffer = (char __user *)buffer;
memcpy(buffer, input, len);
@@ -285,6 +292,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test)
size_t len = sizeof(input) - 1;
loff_t pos = 0;
char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, len, GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
char __user *user_buffer = (char __user *)buffer;
memcpy(buffer, input, len);
@@ -316,6 +324,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_write_single_less_int_min(
size_t max_len = 32, len = max_len;
loff_t pos = 0;
char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, max_len, GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
char __user *user_buffer = (char __user *)buffer;
unsigned long abs_of_less_than_min = (unsigned long)INT_MAX
- (INT_MAX + INT_MIN) + 1;
@@ -354,6 +363,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_write_single_greater_int_max(
size_t max_len = 32, len = max_len;
loff_t pos = 0;
char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, max_len, GFP_USER);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
char __user *user_buffer = (char __user *)buffer;
unsigned long greater_than_max = (unsigned long)INT_MAX + 1;
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl-test: Fix potential null dereference in sysctl-test
2025-01-10 10:07 [PATCH] kernel/sysctl-test: Fix potential null dereference in sysctl-test Charles Han
@ 2025-01-11 12:24 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-13 13:47 ` Joel Granados
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2025-01-11 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charles Han, kees, joel.granados, logang, mcgrof, yzaikin,
gregkh, brendan.higgins
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel, Charles Han
Hi Charles,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on mcgrof/sysctl-next sysctl/sysctl-next v6.13-rc6 next-20250110]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Charles-Han/kernel-sysctl-test-Fix-potential-null-dereference-in-sysctl-test/20250110-181004
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250110100748.63470-1-hanchunchao%40inspur.com
patch subject: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl-test: Fix potential null dereference in sysctl-test
config: i386-randconfig-063-20250111 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250111/202501112024.fU1FgDDE-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250111/202501112024.fU1FgDDE-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501112024.fU1FgDDE-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kernel/sysctl-test.c:38:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *value @@ got void [noderef] __user *const __ptr @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:38:9: sparse: expected void const *value
kernel/sysctl-test.c:38:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *const __ptr
kernel/sysctl-test.c:47:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:47:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:47:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:47:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:47:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:47:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:56:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:56:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:56:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:56:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:56:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:56:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:85:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *value @@ got void [noderef] __user *const __ptr @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:85:9: sparse: expected void const *value
kernel/sysctl-test.c:85:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *const __ptr
kernel/sysctl-test.c:94:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:94:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:94:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:94:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:94:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:94:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:103:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:103:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:103:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:103:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:103:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:103:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:129:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *value @@ got void [noderef] __user *const __ptr @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:129:9: sparse: expected void const *value
kernel/sysctl-test.c:129:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *const __ptr
kernel/sysctl-test.c:136:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:136:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:136:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:136:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:136:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:136:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:140:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:140:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:140:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:140:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:140:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:140:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:164:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *value @@ got void [noderef] __user *const __ptr @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:164:9: sparse: expected void const *value
kernel/sysctl-test.c:164:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *const __ptr
kernel/sysctl-test.c:176:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:176:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:176:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:176:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got void [noderef] __user *buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:176:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:176:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __user *buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:206:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:206:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:206:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:206:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:206:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:206:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:237:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:237:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:237:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:237:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:237:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:237:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:269:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:269:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:269:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:269:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:269:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:269:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:300:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:300:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:300:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:300:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:300:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:300:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:341:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:341:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:341:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:341:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:341:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:341:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:374:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:374:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:374:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
kernel/sysctl-test.c:374:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) @@ expected void * @@ got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer @@
kernel/sysctl-test.c:374:9: sparse: expected void *
kernel/sysctl-test.c:374:9: sparse: got char [noderef] __user *user_buffer
vim +38 kernel/sysctl-test.c
11
12 /*
13 * Test that proc_dointvec will not try to use a NULL .data field even when the
14 * length is non-zero.
15 */
16 static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test)
17 {
18 struct ctl_table null_data_table = {
19 .procname = "foo",
20 /*
21 * Here we are testing that proc_dointvec behaves correctly when
22 * we give it a NULL .data field. Normally this would point to a
23 * piece of memory where the value would be stored.
24 */
25 .data = NULL,
26 .maxlen = sizeof(int),
27 .mode = 0644,
28 .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
29 .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
30 .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE_HUNDRED,
31 };
32 /*
33 * proc_dointvec expects a buffer in user space, so we allocate one. We
34 * also need to cast it to __user so sparse doesn't get mad.
35 */
36 void __user *buffer = (void __user *)kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(int),
37 GFP_USER);
> 38 KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
39 size_t len;
40 loff_t pos;
41
42 /*
43 * We don't care what the starting length is since proc_dointvec should
44 * not try to read because .data is NULL.
45 */
46 len = 1234;
47 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table,
48 KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len,
49 &pos));
50 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
51
52 /*
53 * See above.
54 */
55 len = 1234;
56 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table,
57 KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len,
58 &pos));
59 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
60 }
61
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl-test: Fix potential null dereference in sysctl-test
2025-01-10 10:07 [PATCH] kernel/sysctl-test: Fix potential null dereference in sysctl-test Charles Han
2025-01-11 12:24 ` kernel test robot
@ 2025-01-13 13:47 ` Joel Granados
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Granados @ 2025-01-13 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charles Han
Cc: kees, logang, mcgrof, yzaikin, gregkh, brendan.higgins,
linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:07:48PM +0800, Charles Han wrote:
> kunit_kzalloc() may return a NULL pointer, dereferencing it without
> NULL check may lead to NULL dereference.
> Add a NULL check for buffer.
Please address the 0-day comments.
>
> Fixes: 2cb80dbbbaba ("kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec()")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
> ---
...
> unsigned long abs_of_less_than_min = (unsigned long)INT_MAX
> - (INT_MAX + INT_MIN) + 1;
> @@ -354,6 +363,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_write_single_greater_int_max(
> size_t max_len = 32, len = max_len;
> loff_t pos = 0;
> char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, max_len, GFP_USER);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
> char __user *user_buffer = (char __user *)buffer;
> unsigned long greater_than_max = (unsigned long)INT_MAX + 1;
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
best
--
Joel Granados
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-13 13:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-10 10:07 [PATCH] kernel/sysctl-test: Fix potential null dereference in sysctl-test Charles Han
2025-01-11 12:24 ` kernel test robot
2025-01-13 13:47 ` Joel Granados
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®