From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Antoni Pokusinski <apokusinski01@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
lars@metafoo.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: magnetometer: si7210: fix magnetic field measurement scale
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:06:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250208130600.4bf562d7@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204192454.55489311@jic23-huawei>
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:24:54 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:39:20 +0100
> Antoni Pokusinski <apokusinski01@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 11:26:27AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 11:07:10AM +0100, Antoni Pokusinski wrote:
> > > > Applying the current scale value to the raw magnetic field measurements
> > > > gives the result in mT.
> > > >
> > > > Fix the scale by increasing it 10 times, so that the final result after
> > > > applying the scale is in Gauss.
> > >
> > > No objections against this change, just wondering since these are
> > > the ABI changes (correct?) how should we really handle them in case
> > > some of the user space stuff already relies on 'bad' values?
> > >
> > > --
> > > With Best Regards,
> > > Andy Shevchenko
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Just to clarify: yes, this patch makes the output values compliant to
> > ABI (Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio). According to the ABI, the
> > output values for the magnetic field should be in Gauss, but during
> > the driver development I missed the fact that I return values in mT
> > instead... (1 Gauss = 0.1mT)
> >
> > BTW I see that the patch cb29542a178f ("iio: magnetometer: si7210: add
> > driver for Si7210") is still on the "testing" branch only, so perhaps
> > it's still not too late to apply the fix?
> >
> Ah. I'd not registered that. Definitely makes life easier.
> This will just get queued up behind it and land upstream at the same
> time.
>
> Jonathan
Applied.
>
> > Kind regards,
> > Antoni
> >
> >
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-08 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-02 10:07 Antoni Pokusinski
2025-02-03 9:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-03 15:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-03 19:39 ` Antoni Pokusinski
2025-02-04 19:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-08 13:06 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250208130600.4bf562d7@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=apokusinski01@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®