From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
To: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] nvmet-fcloop: track tport with ref counting
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 19:45:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250226-nvmet-fcloop-v1-5-c0bd83d43e6a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226-nvmet-fcloop-v1-0-c0bd83d43e6a@kernel.org>
The tport object is created via nvmet_fc_register_targetport and freed
via nvmet_fc_unregister_targetport. That means after the port is
unregistered nothing should use it. Thus ensure with refcounting
that there is no user left before the unregister step.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
---
drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
index 80693705c069dd114b2d4f15d0482dd2d713a273..2269b4d20af2ef9bb423617b94a5f5326ea124bd 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
@@ -233,8 +233,12 @@ struct fcloop_tport {
spinlock_t lock;
struct list_head ls_list;
struct work_struct ls_work;
+ struct kref ref;
};
+static int fcloop_tport_get(struct fcloop_tport *tport);
+static void fcloop_tport_put(struct fcloop_tport *tport);
+
struct fcloop_nport {
struct fcloop_rport *rport;
struct fcloop_tport *tport;
@@ -426,6 +430,7 @@ fcloop_tport_lsrqst_work(struct work_struct *work)
spin_lock(&tport->lock);
}
spin_unlock(&tport->lock);
+ fcloop_tport_put(tport);
}
static int
@@ -444,12 +449,16 @@ fcloop_t2h_ls_req(struct nvmet_fc_target_port *targetport, void *hosthandle,
tls_req->lsreq = lsreq;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tls_req->ls_list);
+ if (!tport)
+ return -ECONNABORTED;
+
if (!tport->remoteport) {
tls_req->status = -ECONNREFUSED;
spin_lock(&tport->lock);
list_add_tail(&tls_req->ls_list, &tport->ls_list);
spin_unlock(&tport->lock);
- queue_work(nvmet_wq, &tport->ls_work);
+ if (queue_work(nvmet_wq, &tport->ls_work))
+ fcloop_tport_get(tport);
return ret;
}
@@ -481,7 +490,8 @@ fcloop_t2h_xmt_ls_rsp(struct nvme_fc_local_port *localport,
spin_lock(&tport->lock);
list_add_tail(&tport->ls_list, &tls_req->ls_list);
spin_unlock(&tport->lock);
- queue_work(nvmet_wq, &tport->ls_work);
+ if (queue_work(nvmet_wq, &tport->ls_work))
+ fcloop_tport_get(tport);
}
return 0;
@@ -1496,6 +1506,8 @@ fcloop_create_target_port(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
/* success */
tport = targetport->private;
+ kref_init(&tport->ref);
+
tport->targetport = targetport;
tport->remoteport = (nport->rport) ? nport->rport->remoteport : NULL;
if (nport->rport)
@@ -1526,21 +1538,30 @@ __unlink_target_port(struct fcloop_nport *nport)
return tport;
}
-static int
-__targetport_unreg(struct fcloop_nport *nport, struct fcloop_tport *tport)
+static void
+fcloop_targetport_unreg(struct kref *ref)
{
- int ret;
+ struct fcloop_tport *tport =
+ container_of(ref, struct fcloop_tport, ref);
+ struct fcloop_nport *nport;
- if (!tport) {
- ret = -EALREADY;
- goto out;
- }
+ nport = tport->nport;
+ nvmet_fc_unregister_targetport(tport->targetport);
- ret = nvmet_fc_unregister_targetport(tport->targetport);
-out:
/* nport ref put: targetport */
fcloop_nport_put(nport);
- return ret;
+}
+
+static int
+fcloop_tport_get(struct fcloop_tport *tport)
+{
+ return kref_get_unless_zero(&tport->ref);
+}
+
+static void
+fcloop_tport_put(struct fcloop_tport *tport)
+{
+ kref_put(&tport->ref, fcloop_targetport_unreg);
}
static ssize_t
@@ -1576,8 +1597,7 @@ fcloop_delete_target_port(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
if (!nport)
return -ENOENT;
- ret = __targetport_unreg(nport, tport);
-
+ fcloop_tport_put(tport);
fcloop_nport_put(nport);
return ret ? ret : count;
@@ -1696,9 +1716,7 @@ static void __exit fcloop_exit(void)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fcloop_lock, flags);
- ret = __targetport_unreg(nport, tport);
- if (ret)
- pr_warn("%s: Failed deleting target port\n", __func__);
+ fcloop_tport_put(tport);
ret = __remoteport_unreg(nport, rport);
if (ret)
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 18:45 [PATCH 00/11] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] nvmet-fcloop: remove nport from list on last user Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-05 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] nvmet-fcloop: add ref counting to lport Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-05 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-06 9:26 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-03-06 10:06 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_nport_alloc Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28 7:56 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-03-05 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] nvmet-fcloop: track ref counts for nports Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28 8:09 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 8:18 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2025-02-28 7:27 ` [PATCH 05/11] nvmet-fcloop: track tport with ref counting Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28 8:30 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 14:31 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] nvmet-fcloop: track rport " Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 07/11] nvmet-fc: update tgtport ref per assoc Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 08/11] nvmet-fc: take tgtport reference only once Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28 8:45 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 09/11] nvmet-fc: free pending reqs on tgtport unregister Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 10/11] nvmet-fc: inline nvmet_fc_delete_assoc Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] nvmet-fc: inline nvmet_fc_free_hostport Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-27 16:30 ` [PATCH 00/11] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250226-nvmet-fcloop-v1-5-c0bd83d43e6a@kernel.org \
--to=wagi@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®