mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,  Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	 Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] nvmet-fc: take tgtport reference only once
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:45:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ab71df0-e9e8-4035-a215-f5259c69fe88@flourine.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f944fdb3-081f-474a-9193-f482fe87f72b@suse.de>

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 08:34:51AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 2/26/25 19:46, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > The reference counting code can be simplified. Instead taking a tgtport
> > refrerence at the beginning of nvmet_fc_alloc_hostport and put it back
> > if not a new hostport object is allocated, only take it when a new
> > hostport object is allocated.
> > 
> Can it really?
> Main point of this operation is that 'tgtport' isn't going away during while
> we're figuring out whether we need it.
> 
> With this patch it means that

The tgtport is not going away. nvmet_fc_alloc_hostport can only be
called with reference on tgtport being hold:

nvmet_fc_rcv_ls_req
  nvmet_fc_tgtport_get(tgtport)
  nvmet_fc_handle_ls_rqst_work
    nvmet_fc_handle_ls_rqst
      nvmet_fc_ls_create_association
        nvmet_fc_alloc_target_assoc
          nvmet_fc_alloc_hostport

The goal with this patch here is to make it simpler to read where we
take a ref. IMO, there is not really anything gained by the existing
logic, though I agree it's not obvious that the tgtport is not going
away. Would it be okay to add a comment?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-28  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-26 18:45 [PATCH 00/11] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] nvmet-fcloop: remove nport from list on last user Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:04   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-05 14:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] nvmet-fcloop: add ref counting to lport Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:05   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-05 14:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-06  9:26     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-03-06 10:06       ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_nport_alloc Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:11   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28  7:56     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-03-05 14:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] nvmet-fcloop: track ref counts for nports Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28  8:09     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  8:18     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] nvmet-fcloop: track tport with ref counting Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:27   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28  8:30     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 14:31       ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] nvmet-fcloop: track rport " Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:29   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 07/11] nvmet-fc: update tgtport ref per assoc Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:30   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 08/11] nvmet-fc: take tgtport reference only once Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:34   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28  8:45     ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 09/11] nvmet-fc: free pending reqs on tgtport unregister Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:35   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 10/11] nvmet-fc: inline nvmet_fc_delete_assoc Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:36   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] nvmet-fc: inline nvmet_fc_free_hostport Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28  7:37   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-27 16:30 ` [PATCH 00/11] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ab71df0-e9e8-4035-a215-f5259c69fe88@flourine.local \
    --to=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®