mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 0/2] char: misc: improve test and dynamic allocation
@ 2025-03-18 17:24 Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  2025-03-18 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] char: misc: restrict the dynamic range to exclude reserved minors Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  2025-03-18 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] char: misc: add test cases Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo @ 2025-03-18 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann, Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: Andrew Morton, Dirk VanDerMerwe, Vimal Agrawal, linux-kernel,
	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, kernel-dev

This includes a change that prevents dynamic allocation from using a minor
number that belongs to the historically static reserved range, which is
still used by some drivers.

It also improves the test, including a lot of corner cases, specially ones
that would fail before past fixes.

Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- remove code around DYNAMIC_MINORS and the backwards allocation
- try to open devices in tests by using init_mknod plus filp_open
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250307-misc-dynrange-v2-0-6fe19032ef76@igalia.com

---
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo (2):
      char: misc: restrict the dynamic range to exclude reserved minors
      char: misc: add test cases

 drivers/char/misc.c             |  28 +-
 drivers/misc/misc_minor_kunit.c | 578 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 581 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 2dc25093218f5d42391549de6fe45e1aa9325676
change-id: 20250307-misc-dynrange-d54c92a5e319
prerequisite-change-id: 20250317-misc-chrdev-b26b572a47fc:v1
prerequisite-patch-id: d60dd6f7235bae2a8707c3169969b534be60de52

Best regards,
-- 
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 1/2] char: misc: restrict the dynamic range to exclude reserved minors
  2025-03-18 17:24 [PATCH v3 0/2] char: misc: improve test and dynamic allocation Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
@ 2025-03-18 17:24 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  2025-03-18 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] char: misc: add test cases Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo @ 2025-03-18 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann, Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: Andrew Morton, Dirk VanDerMerwe, Vimal Agrawal, linux-kernel,
	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, kernel-dev

When this was first reported [1], the possibility of having sufficient
number of dynamic misc devices was theoretical, in the case of dlm driver.
In practice, its userspace never created more than one device.

What we know from commit ab760791c0cf ("char: misc: Increase the maximum
number of dynamic misc devices to 1048448"), is that the miscdevice
interface has been used for allocating more than the single-shot devices it
was designed for. And it is not only coresight_tmc, but many other drivers
are able to create multiple devices.

On systems like the ones described in the above commit, it is certain that
the dynamic allocation will allocate certain reserved minor numbers,
leading to failures when a later driver tries to claim its reserved number.

Instead of excluding the historically statically allocated range from
dynamic allocation, restrict the latter to minors above 255. That also
removes the need for DYNAMIC_MINORS and the convolution in allocating minor
numbers, simplifying the code.

Since commit ab760791c0cf ("char: misc: Increase the maximum number of
dynamic misc devices to 1048448") has been applied, such range is already
possible. And given such devices already need to be dynamically created,
there should be no systems where this might become a problem.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1257813017-28598-3-git-send-email-cascardo@holoscopio.com/

Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>
---
 drivers/char/misc.c | 28 +++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/misc.c b/drivers/char/misc.c
index dda466f9181acf76564b5e41ed6e858928e56182..d5accc10a110098f7090dd0f900bc5fae5f75f74 100644
--- a/drivers/char/misc.c
+++ b/drivers/char/misc.c
@@ -58,9 +58,8 @@ static LIST_HEAD(misc_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(misc_mtx);
 
 /*
- * Assigned numbers, used for dynamic minors
+ * Assigned numbers.
  */
-#define DYNAMIC_MINORS 128 /* like dynamic majors */
 static DEFINE_IDA(misc_minors_ida);
 
 static int misc_minor_alloc(int minor)
@@ -69,34 +68,17 @@ static int misc_minor_alloc(int minor)
 
 	if (minor == MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR) {
 		/* allocate free id */
-		ret = ida_alloc_max(&misc_minors_ida, DYNAMIC_MINORS - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (ret >= 0) {
-			ret = DYNAMIC_MINORS - ret - 1;
-		} else {
-			ret = ida_alloc_range(&misc_minors_ida, MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR + 1,
-					      MINORMASK, GFP_KERNEL);
-		}
+		ret = ida_alloc_range(&misc_minors_ida, MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR + 1,
+				      MINORMASK, GFP_KERNEL);
 	} else {
-		/* specific minor, check if it is in dynamic or misc dynamic range  */
-		if (minor < DYNAMIC_MINORS) {
-			minor = DYNAMIC_MINORS - minor - 1;
-			ret = ida_alloc_range(&misc_minors_ida, minor, minor, GFP_KERNEL);
-		} else if (minor > MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR) {
-			ret = ida_alloc_range(&misc_minors_ida, minor, minor, GFP_KERNEL);
-		} else {
-			/* case of non-dynamic minors, no need to allocate id */
-			ret = 0;
-		}
+		ret = ida_alloc_range(&misc_minors_ida, minor, minor, GFP_KERNEL);
 	}
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static void misc_minor_free(int minor)
 {
-	if (minor < DYNAMIC_MINORS)
-		ida_free(&misc_minors_ida, DYNAMIC_MINORS - minor - 1);
-	else if (minor > MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR)
-		ida_free(&misc_minors_ida, minor);
+	ida_free(&misc_minors_ida, minor);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS

-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 2/2] char: misc: add test cases
  2025-03-18 17:24 [PATCH v3 0/2] char: misc: improve test and dynamic allocation Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  2025-03-18 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] char: misc: restrict the dynamic range to exclude reserved minors Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
@ 2025-03-18 17:24 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo @ 2025-03-18 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann, Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: Andrew Morton, Dirk VanDerMerwe, Vimal Agrawal, linux-kernel,
	Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, kernel-dev

Add test cases for static and dynamic minor number allocation and
deallocation.

While at it, improve description and test suite name.

Some of the cases include:

- that static and dynamic allocation reserved the expected minors.

- that registering duplicate minors or duplicate names will fail.

- that failing to create a sysfs file (due to duplicate names) will
  deallocate the dynamic minor correctly.

- that dynamic allocation does not allocate a minor number in the static
  range.

- that there are no collisions when mixing dynamic and static allocations.

- that opening devices with various minor device numbers work.

- that registering a static number in the dynamic range won't conflict with
  a dynamic allocation.

This last test verifies the bug fixed by commit 6d04d2b554b1 ("misc:
misc_minor_alloc to use ida for all dynamic/misc dynamic minors") has not
regressed.

Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>
---
 drivers/misc/misc_minor_kunit.c | 578 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 576 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/misc_minor_kunit.c b/drivers/misc/misc_minor_kunit.c
index 293e0fb7e43edc330842722e1132d16cd23e3aa8..19b51a464e3f90f2ad3f9ef46ef77eb0d149ffa4 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/misc_minor_kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/misc_minor_kunit.c
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
 #include <kunit/test-bug.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/file.h>
+#include <linux/init_syscalls.h>
 
 /* dynamic minor (2) */
 static struct miscdevice dev_dynamic_minor = {
@@ -51,19 +54,590 @@ static void kunit_misc_dynamic_minor(struct kunit *test)
 	misc_deregister(&dev_misc_dynamic_minor);
 }
 
+struct miscdev_test_case {
+	const char *str;
+	int minor;
+};
+
+static struct miscdev_test_case miscdev_test_ranges[] = {
+	{
+		.str = "lower static range, top",
+		.minor = 15,
+	},
+	{
+		.str = "upper static range, bottom",
+		.minor = 130,
+	},
+	{
+		.str = "lower static range, bottom",
+		.minor = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		.str = "upper static range, top",
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR - 1,
+	},
+};
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(miscdev, miscdev_test_ranges, str);
+
+static int miscdev_find_minors(struct kunit_suite *suite)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct miscdevice miscstat = {
+		.name = "miscstat",
+	};
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 15; i >= 0; i--) {
+		miscstat.minor = i;
+		ret = misc_register(&miscstat);
+		if (ret == 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (ret == 0) {
+		kunit_info(suite, "found misc device minor %d available\n",
+				miscstat.minor);
+		miscdev_test_ranges[0].minor = miscstat.minor;
+		misc_deregister(&miscstat);
+	} else {
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 128; i < MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR; i++) {
+		miscstat.minor = i;
+		ret = misc_register(&miscstat);
+		if (ret == 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (ret == 0) {
+		kunit_info(suite, "found misc device minor %d available\n",
+				miscstat.minor);
+		miscdev_test_ranges[1].minor = miscstat.minor;
+		misc_deregister(&miscstat);
+	} else {
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < miscdev_test_ranges[0].minor; i++) {
+		miscstat.minor = i;
+		ret = misc_register(&miscstat);
+		if (ret == 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (ret == 0) {
+		kunit_info(suite, "found misc device minor %d available\n",
+			miscstat.minor);
+		miscdev_test_ranges[2].minor = miscstat.minor;
+		misc_deregister(&miscstat);
+	} else {
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	for (i = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR - 1; i > miscdev_test_ranges[1].minor; i--) {
+		miscstat.minor = i;
+		ret = misc_register(&miscstat);
+		if (ret == 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (ret == 0) {
+		kunit_info(suite, "found misc device minor %d available\n",
+			miscstat.minor);
+		miscdev_test_ranges[3].minor = miscstat.minor;
+		misc_deregister(&miscstat);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static bool is_valid_dynamic_minor(int minor)
+{
+	if (minor < 0)
+		return false;
+	if (minor == MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR)
+		return false;
+	if (minor >= 0 && minor <= 15)
+		return false;
+	if (minor >= 128 && minor < MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR)
+		return false;
+	return true;
+}
+
+static int miscdev_test_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations miscdev_test_fops = {
+	.open	= miscdev_test_open,
+};
+
+static void miscdev_test_can_open(struct kunit *test, struct miscdevice *misc)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct file *filp;
+	char *devname;
+
+	devname = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "/dev/%s", misc->name);
+	ret = init_mknod(devname, S_IFCHR | 0600,
+			 new_encode_dev(MKDEV(MISC_MAJOR, misc->minor)));
+	if (ret != 0)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "failed to create node\n");
+
+	filp = filp_open(devname, O_RDONLY, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(filp))
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "failed to open misc device: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(filp));
+	else
+		fput(filp);
+
+	init_unlink(devname);
+	kfree(devname);
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_static_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct miscdevice misc_test = {
+		.name = "misc_test",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	int ret;
+	const struct miscdev_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+
+	misc_test.minor = params->minor;
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc_test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, misc_test.minor, params->minor);
+
+	if (ret == 0) {
+		miscdev_test_can_open(test, &misc_test);
+		misc_deregister(&misc_test);
+	}
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_dynamic_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct miscdevice misc_test = {
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+		.name = "misc_test",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc_test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(misc_test.minor));
+
+	if (ret == 0) {
+		miscdev_test_can_open(test, &misc_test);
+		misc_deregister(&misc_test);
+	}
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_twice(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct miscdevice misc_test = {
+		.name = "misc_test",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	int ret;
+	const struct miscdev_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+
+	misc_test.minor = params->minor;
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc_test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, misc_test.minor, params->minor);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&misc_test);
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc_test);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, misc_test.minor, params->minor);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&misc_test);
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_duplicate_minor(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct miscdevice misc1 = {
+		.name = "misc1",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	struct miscdevice misc2 = {
+		.name = "misc2",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	int ret;
+	const struct miscdev_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+
+	misc1.minor = params->minor;
+	misc2.minor = params->minor;
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, misc1.minor, params->minor);
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EBUSY);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&misc2);
+
+	misc_deregister(&misc1);
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_duplicate_name(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct miscdevice misc1 = {
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+		.name = "misc1",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	struct miscdevice misc2 = {
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+		.name = "misc1",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(misc1.minor));
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EEXIST);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&misc2);
+
+	misc_deregister(&misc1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that after a duplicate name failure, the reserved minor number is
+ * freed to be allocated next.
+ */
+static void miscdev_test_duplicate_name_leak(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct miscdevice misc1 = {
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+		.name = "misc1",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	struct miscdevice misc2 = {
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+		.name = "misc1",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	struct miscdevice misc3 = {
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+		.name = "misc3",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	int ret;
+	int dyn_minor;
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(misc1.minor));
+
+	/*
+	 * Find out what is the next minor number available.
+	 */
+	ret = misc_register(&misc3);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(misc3.minor));
+	dyn_minor = misc3.minor;
+	misc_deregister(&misc3);
+	misc3.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
+
+	ret = misc_register(&misc2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EEXIST);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&misc2);
+
+	/*
+	 * Now check that we can still get the same minor we found before.
+	 */
+	ret = misc_register(&misc3);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(misc3.minor));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, misc3.minor, dyn_minor);
+	misc_deregister(&misc3);
+
+	misc_deregister(&misc1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Try to register a static minor with a duplicate name. That might not
+ * deallocate the minor, preventing it from being used again.
+ */
+static void miscdev_test_duplicate_error(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct miscdevice miscdyn = {
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+		.name = "name1",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	struct miscdevice miscstat = {
+		.name = "name1",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	struct miscdevice miscnew = {
+		.name = "name2",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	int ret;
+	const struct miscdev_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+
+	miscstat.minor = params->minor;
+	miscnew.minor = params->minor;
+
+	ret = misc_register(&miscdyn);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(miscdyn.minor));
+
+	ret = misc_register(&miscstat);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EEXIST);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&miscstat);
+
+	ret = misc_register(&miscnew);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, miscnew.minor, params->minor);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&miscnew);
+
+	misc_deregister(&miscdyn);
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_dynamic_only_range(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct miscdevice *miscdev;
+	const int dynamic_minors = 256;
+	int i;
+
+	miscdev = kunit_kmalloc_array(test, dynamic_minors,
+					sizeof(struct miscdevice),
+					GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < dynamic_minors; i++) {
+		miscdev[i].minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
+		miscdev[i].name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "misc_test%d", i);
+		miscdev[i].fops = &miscdev_test_fops;
+		ret = misc_register(&miscdev[i]);
+		if (ret != 0)
+			break;
+		/*
+		 * This is the bug we are looking for!
+		 * We asked for a dynamic minor and got a minor in the static range space.
+		 */
+		if (miscdev[i].minor >= 0 && miscdev[i].minor <= 15) {
+			KUNIT_FAIL(test, "misc_register allocated minor %d\n", miscdev[i].minor);
+			i++;
+			break;
+		}
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(miscdev[i].minor));
+	}
+
+	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
+		miscdev_test_can_open(test, &miscdev[i]);
+		misc_deregister(&miscdev[i]);
+		kfree_const(miscdev[i].name);
+	}
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_collision(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct miscdevice *miscdev;
+	struct miscdevice miscstat = {
+		.name = "miscstat",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	const int dynamic_minors = 256;
+	int i;
+
+	miscdev = kunit_kmalloc_array(test, dynamic_minors,
+					sizeof(struct miscdevice),
+					GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+
+	miscstat.minor = miscdev_test_ranges[0].minor;
+	ret = misc_register(&miscstat);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, miscstat.minor, miscdev_test_ranges[0].minor);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < dynamic_minors; i++) {
+		miscdev[i].minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
+		miscdev[i].name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "misc_test%d", i);
+		miscdev[i].fops = &miscdev_test_fops;
+		ret = misc_register(&miscdev[i]);
+		if (ret != 0)
+			break;
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(miscdev[i].minor));
+	}
+
+	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
+		miscdev_test_can_open(test, &miscdev[i]);
+		misc_deregister(&miscdev[i]);
+		kfree_const(miscdev[i].name);
+	}
+
+	misc_deregister(&miscstat);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_collision_reverse(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct miscdevice *miscdev;
+	struct miscdevice miscstat = {
+		.name = "miscstat",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	const int dynamic_minors = 256;
+	int i;
+
+	miscdev = kunit_kmalloc_array(test, dynamic_minors,
+					sizeof(struct miscdevice),
+					GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < dynamic_minors; i++) {
+		miscdev[i].minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
+		miscdev[i].name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "misc_test%d", i);
+		miscdev[i].fops = &miscdev_test_fops;
+		ret = misc_register(&miscdev[i]);
+		if (ret != 0)
+			break;
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(miscdev[i].minor));
+	}
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	miscstat.minor = miscdev_test_ranges[0].minor;
+	ret = misc_register(&miscstat);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, miscstat.minor, miscdev_test_ranges[0].minor);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&miscstat);
+
+	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
+		miscdev_test_can_open(test, &miscdev[i]);
+		misc_deregister(&miscdev[i]);
+		kfree_const(miscdev[i].name);
+	}
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_conflict(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct miscdevice miscdyn = {
+		.name = "miscdyn",
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	struct miscdevice miscstat = {
+		.name = "miscstat",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+
+	ret = misc_register(&miscdyn);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(miscdyn.minor));
+
+	/*
+	 * Try to register a static minor with the same minor as the
+	 * dynamic one.
+	 */
+	miscstat.minor = miscdyn.minor;
+	ret = misc_register(&miscstat);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EBUSY);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&miscstat);
+
+	miscdev_test_can_open(test, &miscdyn);
+
+	misc_deregister(&miscdyn);
+}
+
+static void miscdev_test_conflict_reverse(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct miscdevice miscdyn = {
+		.name = "miscdyn",
+		.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+	struct miscdevice miscstat = {
+		.name = "miscstat",
+		.fops = &miscdev_test_fops,
+	};
+
+	/*
+	 * Find the first available dynamic minor to use it as a static
+	 * minor later on.
+	 */
+	ret = misc_register(&miscdyn);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(miscdyn.minor));
+	miscstat.minor = miscdyn.minor;
+	misc_deregister(&miscdyn);
+
+	ret = misc_register(&miscstat);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, miscstat.minor, miscdyn.minor);
+
+	/*
+	 * Try to register a dynamic minor after registering a static minor
+	 * within the dynamic range. It should work but get a different
+	 * minor.
+	 */
+	miscdyn.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
+	ret = misc_register(&miscdyn);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, miscdyn.minor, miscstat.minor);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_valid_dynamic_minor(miscdyn.minor));
+	if (ret == 0)
+		misc_deregister(&miscdyn);
+
+	miscdev_test_can_open(test, &miscstat);
+
+	misc_deregister(&miscstat);
+}
+
 static struct kunit_case test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_dynamic_minor),
 	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_static_minor),
 	KUNIT_CASE(kunit_misc_dynamic_minor),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(miscdev_test_static_basic, miscdev_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE(miscdev_test_dynamic_basic),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(miscdev_test_twice, miscdev_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(miscdev_test_duplicate_minor, miscdev_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE(miscdev_test_duplicate_name),
+	KUNIT_CASE(miscdev_test_duplicate_name_leak),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(miscdev_test_duplicate_error, miscdev_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE(miscdev_test_dynamic_only_range),
+	KUNIT_CASE(miscdev_test_collision),
+	KUNIT_CASE(miscdev_test_collision_reverse),
+	KUNIT_CASE(miscdev_test_conflict),
+	KUNIT_CASE(miscdev_test_conflict_reverse),
 	{}
 };
 
 static struct kunit_suite test_suite = {
-	.name = "misc_minor_test",
+	.name = "miscdev",
+	.suite_init = miscdev_find_minors,
 	.test_cases = test_cases,
 };
 kunit_test_suite(test_suite);
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Vimal Agrawal");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("misc minor testing");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test module for misc character devices");

-- 
2.47.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-18 17:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-18 17:24 [PATCH v3 0/2] char: misc: improve test and dynamic allocation Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2025-03-18 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] char: misc: restrict the dynamic range to exclude reserved minors Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2025-03-18 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] char: misc: add test cases Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®