mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Further check old SPTE is leaf for spurious prefetch fault
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:31:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250318013111.5648-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318013038.5628-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>

Instead of simply treating a prefetch fault as spurious when there's a
shadow-present old SPTE, further check if the old SPTE is leaf to determine
if a prefetch fault is spurious.

It's not reasonable to treat a prefetch fault as spurious when there's a
shadow-present non-leaf SPTE without a corresponding shadow-present leaf
SPTE. e.g., in the following sequence, a prefetch fault should not be
considered spurious:
1. add a memslot with size 4K
2. prefault GPA A in the memslot
3. delete the memslot (zap all disabled)
4. re-add the memslot with size 2M
5. prefault GPA A again.
In step 5, the prefetch fault attempts to install a 2M huge entry.
Since step 3 zaps the leaf SPTE for GPA A while keeping the non-leaf SPTE,
the leaf entry will remain empty after step 5 if the fetch fault is
regarded as spurious due to a shadow-present non-leaf SPTE.

Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c     | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 8160870398b9..94c677f8cc05 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2846,7 +2846,7 @@ static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 	}
 
 	if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep)) {
-		if (prefetch)
+		if (prefetch && is_last_spte(*sptep, level))
 			return RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
 
 		/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 046b6ba31197..ab65fd915ef2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1137,7 +1137,8 @@ static int tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sp->role.level != fault->goal_level))
 		return RET_PF_RETRY;
 
-	if (fault->prefetch && is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte))
+	if (fault->prefetch && is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) &&
+	    is_last_spte(iter->old_spte, iter->level))
 		return RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
 
 	if (is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) &&
-- 
2.43.2


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-18  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-18  1:30 [PATCH v2 0/5] Small changes related to prefetch and spurious faults Yan Zhao
2025-03-18  1:31 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2025-03-18  1:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Merge prefetch and access checks for " Yan Zhao
2025-03-18  1:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: WARN if PFN changes " Yan Zhao
2025-03-18  1:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Warn if PFN changes on shadow-present SPTE in shadow MMU Yan Zhao
2025-03-18  1:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Check and free obsolete roots in kvm_mmu_reload() Yan Zhao
2025-05-02 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Small changes related to prefetch and spurious faults Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250318013111.5648-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®