From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Merge prefetch and access checks for spurious faults
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:32:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250318013210.5701-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318013038.5628-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Combine prefetch and is_access_allowed() checks into a unified path to
detect spurious faults, since both cases now share identical logic.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index ab65fd915ef2..6365eb6c1390 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1137,12 +1137,8 @@ static int tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sp->role.level != fault->goal_level))
return RET_PF_RETRY;
- if (fault->prefetch && is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) &&
- is_last_spte(iter->old_spte, iter->level))
- return RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
-
if (is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) &&
- is_access_allowed(fault, iter->old_spte) &&
+ (fault->prefetch || is_access_allowed(fault, iter->old_spte)) &&
is_last_spte(iter->old_spte, iter->level))
return RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
--
2.43.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 1:30 [PATCH v2 0/5] Small changes related to prefetch and " Yan Zhao
2025-03-18 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Further check old SPTE is leaf for spurious prefetch fault Yan Zhao
2025-03-18 1:32 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2025-03-18 1:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: WARN if PFN changes for spurious faults Yan Zhao
2025-03-18 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Warn if PFN changes on shadow-present SPTE in shadow MMU Yan Zhao
2025-03-18 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Check and free obsolete roots in kvm_mmu_reload() Yan Zhao
2025-05-02 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Small changes related to prefetch and spurious faults Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250318013210.5701-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®