From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/29] x86/cacheinfo: Properly name amd_cpuid4()'s first parameter
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:21:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250319122137.4004-7-darwi@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250319122137.4004-1-darwi@linutronix.de>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
amd_cpuid4()'s first parameter, "leaf", is not a CPUID leaf as the name
implies. Rather, it's an index emulating CPUID(4)'s subleaf semantics;
i.e. an ID for the cache object currently enumerated. Rename that
parameter to "index".
Apply minor coding style fixes to the rest of the function as well.
[ darwi: Move into a separate commit and write commit log.
Use "index" instead of "subleaf" for amd_cpuid4() first param,
as that's the name typically used at the whole of cacheinfo.c. ]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
index d0bfdb85b96a..0fd4e9673665 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
@@ -233,12 +233,10 @@ static const enum cache_type cache_type_map[] = {
};
static void
-amd_cpuid4(int leaf, union _cpuid4_leaf_eax *eax,
- union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx *ebx,
- union _cpuid4_leaf_ecx *ecx)
+amd_cpuid4(int index, union _cpuid4_leaf_eax *eax,
+ union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx *ebx, union _cpuid4_leaf_ecx *ecx)
{
- unsigned dummy;
- unsigned line_size, lines_per_tag, assoc, size_in_kb;
+ unsigned int dummy, line_size, lines_per_tag, assoc, size_in_kb;
union l1_cache l1i, l1d;
union l2_cache l2;
union l3_cache l3;
@@ -251,7 +249,7 @@ amd_cpuid4(int leaf, union _cpuid4_leaf_eax *eax,
cpuid(0x80000005, &dummy, &dummy, &l1d.val, &l1i.val);
cpuid(0x80000006, &dummy, &dummy, &l2.val, &l3.val);
- switch (leaf) {
+ switch (index) {
case 1:
l1 = &l1i;
fallthrough;
@@ -289,12 +287,11 @@ amd_cpuid4(int leaf, union _cpuid4_leaf_eax *eax,
}
eax->split.is_self_initializing = 1;
- eax->split.type = types[leaf];
- eax->split.level = levels[leaf];
+ eax->split.type = types[index];
+ eax->split.level = levels[index];
eax->split.num_threads_sharing = 0;
eax->split.num_cores_on_die = topology_num_cores_per_package();
-
if (assoc == 0xffff)
eax->split.is_fully_associative = 1;
ebx->split.coherency_line_size = line_size - 1;
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-19 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-19 12:21 [PATCH v3 00/29] x86: Leaf 0x2 and leaf 0x4 refactorings Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 01/29] x86/cpu: Remove leaf 0x2 parsing loop Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 02/29] x86/cacheinfo: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 03/29] x86/cpu: Introduce and use leaf 0x2 parsing helpers Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 04/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/29] x86/cacheinfo: Refactor leaf 0x2 cache descriptor lookup Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 07/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use proper name for cacheinfo instances Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 08/29] x86/cacheinfo: Constify _cpuid4_info_regs instances Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 09/29] x86/cacheinfo: Align ci_info_init() assignment expressions Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 10/29] x86/cacheinfo: Standardize _cpuid4_info_regs instance naming Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 11/29] x86/cacheinfo: Consolidate AMD/Hygon leaf 0x8000001d calls Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 12/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate amd_northbridge from _cpuid4_info_regs Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 13/29] x86/cacheinfo: Move AMD cache_disable_0/1 handling to separate file Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 14/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use sysfs_emit() for sysfs attributes show() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 15/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate Intel and AMD leaf 0x4 code paths Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 16/29] x86/cacheinfo: Rename _cpuid4_info_regs to _cpuid4_info Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 17/29] x86/cacheinfo: Clarify type markers for leaf 0x2 cache descriptors Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 18/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use enums for cache descriptor types Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 19/29] x86/cpu: Use enums for TLB " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 20/29] x86/cpu: Consolidate CPUID leaf 0x2 tables Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 21/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use consolidated leaf 0x2 descriptor table Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 22/29] x86/cpu: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-24 7:37 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-24 11:15 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 23/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate leaf 0x2 handling and post-processing logic Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 24/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate Intel leaf 0x4 handling Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 25/29] x86/cacheinfo: Extract out cache level topology ID calculation Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 26/29] x86/cacheinfo: Extract out cache self-snoop checks Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 27/29] x86/cacheinfo: Relocate leaf 0x4 cache_type mapping Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 28/29] x86/cacheinfo: Introduce cpuid_amd_hygon_has_l3_cache() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 12:21 ` [PATCH v3 29/29] x86/cacheinfo: Apply maintainer-tip coding style fixes Ahmed S. Darwish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250319122137.4004-7-darwi@linutronix.de \
--to=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®