mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Don't clear perf metrics overflow bit unconditionally
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:41:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250415104135.318169-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)

The below code would always unconditionally clear other status bits like
perf metrics overflow bit once PEBS buffer overflows.

        status &= intel_ctrl | GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI;

This is incorrect. Perf metrics overflow bit should be cleared only when
fixed counter 3 in PEBS counter group. Otherwise perf metrics overflow
could be missed to handle.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250225110012.GK31462@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
Fixes: 7b2c05a15d29 ("perf/x86/intel: Generic support for hardware TopDown metrics")
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 0ceaa1b07019..c6f69ce3b2b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3140,7 +3140,6 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 	int bit;
 	int handled = 0;
-	u64 intel_ctrl = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_ctrl);
 
 	inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs);
 
@@ -3184,7 +3183,6 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
 		handled++;
 		x86_pmu_handle_guest_pebs(regs, &data);
 		static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data);
-		status &= intel_ctrl | GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI;
 
 		/*
 		 * PMI throttle may be triggered, which stops the PEBS event.
@@ -3195,6 +3193,15 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
 		 */
 		if (pebs_enabled != cpuc->pebs_enabled)
 			wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, cpuc->pebs_enabled);
+
+		/*
+		 * Above PEBS handler (PEBS counters snapshotting) has updated fixed
+		 * counter 3 and perf metrics counts if they are in counter group,
+		 * unnecessary to update again.
+		 */
+		if (cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS] &&
+		    is_pebs_counter_event_group(cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS]))
+			status &= ~GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -3214,6 +3221,8 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
 		static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(NULL, NULL);
 	}
 
+	status &= hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_ctrl);
+
 	/*
 	 * Checkpointed counters can lead to 'spurious' PMIs because the
 	 * rollback caused by the PMI will have cleared the overflow status

base-commit: 5c3627b6f0595f1ec27e6f5df903bd072e9b9136
-- 
2.40.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-04-15  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-15 10:41 Dapeng Mi [this message]
2025-04-15 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel: Allow to update user space GPRs from PEBS records Dapeng Mi
2025-04-17 13:01   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2025-04-15 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Don't clear perf metrics overflow bit unconditionally Liang, Kan
2025-04-17 13:01 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250415104135.318169-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®