From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Don't clear perf metrics overflow bit unconditionally
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:47:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7666eeaf-930c-4c4b-bcb8-9767feff10f6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415104135.318169-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
On 2025-04-15 6:41 a.m., Dapeng Mi wrote:
> The below code would always unconditionally clear other status bits like
> perf metrics overflow bit once PEBS buffer overflows.
>
> status &= intel_ctrl | GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI;
>
> This is incorrect. Perf metrics overflow bit should be cleared only when
> fixed counter 3 in PEBS counter group. Otherwise perf metrics overflow
> could be missed to handle.
>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250225110012.GK31462@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
> Fixes: 7b2c05a15d29 ("perf/x86/intel: Generic support for hardware TopDown metrics")
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
For the two patches,
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Kan
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 0ceaa1b07019..c6f69ce3b2b3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3140,7 +3140,6 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> int bit;
> int handled = 0;
> - u64 intel_ctrl = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_ctrl);
>
> inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs);
>
> @@ -3184,7 +3183,6 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
> handled++;
> x86_pmu_handle_guest_pebs(regs, &data);
> static_call(x86_pmu_drain_pebs)(regs, &data);
> - status &= intel_ctrl | GLOBAL_STATUS_TRACE_TOPAPMI;
>
> /*
> * PMI throttle may be triggered, which stops the PEBS event.
> @@ -3195,6 +3193,15 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
> */
> if (pebs_enabled != cpuc->pebs_enabled)
> wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, cpuc->pebs_enabled);
> +
> + /*
> + * Above PEBS handler (PEBS counters snapshotting) has updated fixed
> + * counter 3 and perf metrics counts if they are in counter group,
> + * unnecessary to update again.
> + */
> + if (cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS] &&
> + is_pebs_counter_event_group(cpuc->events[INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_SLOTS]))
> + status &= ~GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -3214,6 +3221,8 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_regs *regs, u64 status)
> static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(NULL, NULL);
> }
>
> + status &= hybrid(cpuc->pmu, intel_ctrl);
> +
> /*
> * Checkpointed counters can lead to 'spurious' PMIs because the
> * rollback caused by the PMI will have cleared the overflow status
>
> base-commit: 5c3627b6f0595f1ec27e6f5df903bd072e9b9136
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-15 10:41 Dapeng Mi
2025-04-15 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel: Allow to update user space GPRs from PEBS records Dapeng Mi
2025-04-17 13:01 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
2025-04-15 18:47 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2025-04-17 13:01 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Don't clear perf metrics overflow bit unconditionally tip-bot2 for Dapeng Mi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7666eeaf-930c-4c4b-bcb8-9767feff10f6@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®