From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Cc: andrzej.hajda@intel.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
rfoss@kernel.org, jonas@kwiboo.se, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com,
maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: fsl-ldb: simplify device_node error handling
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 00:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250514224410.GL23592@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514222453.440915-4-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Hi Marco,
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 12:24:53AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Make use of __free(device_node) to simplify the of_node_put() error
> handling paths. No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
> index e0a229c91953..cea9ddaa5e01 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/fsl-ldb.c
> @@ -287,8 +287,9 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs funcs = {
> static int fsl_ldb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct device_node *panel_node;
> - struct device_node *remote1, *remote2;
> + struct device_node *panel_node __free(device_node) = NULL;
> + struct device_node *remote1 __free(device_node) = NULL;
> + struct device_node *remote2 __free(device_node) = NULL;
> struct drm_panel *panel;
> struct fsl_ldb *fsl_ldb;
> int dual_link;
> @@ -321,21 +322,16 @@ static int fsl_ldb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> remote2 = of_graph_get_remote_node(dev->of_node, 2, 0);
> fsl_ldb->ch0_enabled = (remote1 != NULL);
> fsl_ldb->ch1_enabled = (remote2 != NULL);
> - panel_node = of_node_get(remote1 ? remote1 : remote2);
> - of_node_put(remote1);
> - of_node_put(remote2);
> + panel_node = remote1 ? remote1 : remote2;
This will cause a double put of panel_node, once due to __free() on
remote1 or remote2, and the second time due to __free() on panel_node.
>
> - if (!fsl_ldb->ch0_enabled && !fsl_ldb->ch1_enabled) {
> - of_node_put(panel_node);
> + if (!fsl_ldb->ch0_enabled && !fsl_ldb->ch1_enabled)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENXIO, "No panel node found");
> - }
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "Using %s\n",
> fsl_ldb_is_dual(fsl_ldb) ? "dual-link mode" :
> fsl_ldb->ch0_enabled ? "channel 0" : "channel 1");
>
> panel = of_drm_find_panel(panel_node);
> - of_node_put(panel_node);
> if (IS_ERR(panel))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(panel), "drm panel not found\n");
>
> @@ -345,14 +341,12 @@ static int fsl_ldb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "drm panel-bridge add failed\n");
>
> if (fsl_ldb_is_dual(fsl_ldb)) {
> - struct device_node *port1, *port2;
> + struct device_node *port1 __free(device_node) =
> + of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 1);
> + struct device_node *port2 __free(device_node) =
> + of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 2);
>
> - port1 = of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 1);
> - port2 = of_graph_get_port_by_id(dev->of_node, 2);
> dual_link = drm_of_lvds_get_dual_link_pixel_order(port1, port2);
> - of_node_put(port1);
> - of_node_put(port2);
> -
> if (dual_link < 0)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, dual_link,
> "Error getting dual link configuration\n");
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-14 22:24 [PATCH 0/3] i.MX fsl-ldb cleanups Marco Felsch
2025-05-14 22:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/bridge: fsl-ldb: make use of driver_private Marco Felsch
2025-05-14 22:45 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-05-14 23:04 ` Marco Felsch
2025-05-24 0:38 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-14 22:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/bridge: fsl-ldb: make use of dev_err_probe Marco Felsch
2025-05-14 22:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-05-15 6:21 ` Alexander Stein
2025-05-14 22:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: fsl-ldb: simplify device_node error handling Marco Felsch
2025-05-14 22:44 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2025-05-14 23:07 ` Marco Felsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250514224410.GL23592@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®