Re: [PATCH v9 12/20] acpi/generic_event_device: add logic to detect if HEST addr is available

[Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 30 May 2025 22:18:10 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:

> Em Fri, 30 May 2025 16:49:03 +0200
> Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> escreveu:
> 
> > On Fri, 30 May 2025 08:01:28 -0400
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 05:42:12PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:    
> > > > On Tue, 20 May 2025 08:41:31 +0200
> > > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >       
> > > > > Create a new property (x-has-hest-addr) and use it to detect if
> > > > > the GHES table offsets can be calculated from the HEST address
> > > > > (qemu 10.0 and upper) or via the legacy way via an offset obtained
> > > > > from the hardware_errors firmware file.      
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > it doesn't apply to current master anymore      
> > > 
> > > indeed. Mauro?    
> > 
> > Michael,
> > it's trivial conflict in machine compat,
> > could you fix it up while applying?  
> 
> IMHO, that's the best. The thing is, as code gets merged upstream with
> backports, conflicts happen.
> 
> I can re-send the series, if you prefer, as I'm keeping it rebasing it
> from time to time at:
> 	https://gitlab.com/mchehab_kernel/qemu/-/tree/qemu_submitted?ref_type=heads
> 
> (it is on the top of upstream/master)
> 
> But even that might have conflicts on your test tree if you pick
> other patches touching this backport table:
> 
> > -GlobalProperty hw_compat_10_0[] = {};
> > +GlobalProperty hw_compat_10_0[] = {
> > +    { TYPE_ACPI_GED, "x-has-hest-addr", "false" },
> > +};  
> 
> (this was the code when I sent the PR. When applying upstream,
> such hunk is now(*):
> 
>  GlobalProperty hw_compat_10_0[] = {
>      { "scsi-hd", "dpofua", "off" },
> +    { TYPE_ACPI_GED, "x-has-hest-addr", "false" },
>  };
> 
> 
> (*) https://gitlab.com/mchehab_kernel/qemu/-/commit/08c4859f8c6f36d7dccf2b773be88847e5d1fe0c
> 
> If you still prefer that I resubmit the entire PR, let me know.

If it's the only patch that needs rebase and doesn't affect the rest,
I'd say there is no need to spam the list with whole series respin, 
just post rebased v10 12/20 as reply here

If it's more than that, respin series.

> 
> Regards,
> Mauro
>