mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: <saeedm@nvidia.com>, <gal@nvidia.com>, <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	<tariqt@nvidia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Amir Tzin <amirtz@nvidia.com>,
	Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>,
	Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 2/9] net/mlx5: Fix ECVF vports unload on shutdown flow
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:15:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610151514.1094735-3-mbloch@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610151514.1094735-1-mbloch@nvidia.com>

From: Amir Tzin <amirtz@nvidia.com>

Fix shutdown flow UAF when a virtual function is created on the embedded
chip (ECVF) of a BlueField device. In such case the vport acl ingress
table is not properly destroyed.

ECVF functionality is independent of ecpf_vport_exists capability and
thus functions mlx5_eswitch_(enable|disable)_pf_vf_vports() should not
test it when enabling/disabling ECVF vports.

kernel log:
[] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
[] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at lib/refcount.c:28
   refcount_warn_saturate+0x124/0x220
----------------
[] Call trace:
[] refcount_warn_saturate+0x124/0x220
[] tree_put_node+0x164/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]
[] mlx5_destroy_flow_table+0x98/0x2c0 [mlx5_core]
[] esw_acl_ingress_table_destroy+0x28/0x40 [mlx5_core]
[] esw_acl_ingress_lgcy_cleanup+0x80/0xf4 [mlx5_core]
[] esw_legacy_vport_acl_cleanup+0x44/0x60 [mlx5_core]
[] esw_vport_cleanup+0x64/0x90 [mlx5_core]
[] mlx5_esw_vport_disable+0xc0/0x1d0 [mlx5_core]
[] mlx5_eswitch_unload_ec_vf_vports+0xcc/0x150 [mlx5_core]
[] mlx5_eswitch_disable_sriov+0x198/0x2a0 [mlx5_core]
[] mlx5_device_disable_sriov+0xb8/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]
[] mlx5_sriov_detach+0x40/0x50 [mlx5_core]
[] mlx5_unload+0x40/0xc4 [mlx5_core]
[] mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked+0x6c/0xe4 [mlx5_core]
[] mlx5_unload_one+0x3c/0x60 [mlx5_core]
[] shutdown+0x7c/0xa4 [mlx5_core]
[] pci_device_shutdown+0x3c/0xa0
[] device_shutdown+0x170/0x340
[] __do_sys_reboot+0x1f4/0x2a0
[] __arm64_sys_reboot+0x2c/0x40
[] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x100
[] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x54/0x184
[] do_el0_svc+0x30/0xac
[] el0_svc+0x48/0x160
[] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa4/0x12c
[] el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
[] --[ end trace 9c4601d68c70030e ]---

Fixes: a7719b29a821 ("net/mlx5: Add management of EC VF vports")
Reviewed-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Amir Tzin <amirtz@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c | 21 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
index 7fb8a3381f84..4917d185d0c3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
@@ -1295,12 +1295,15 @@ mlx5_eswitch_enable_pf_vf_vports(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 		ret = mlx5_eswitch_load_pf_vf_vport(esw, MLX5_VPORT_ECPF, enabled_events);
 		if (ret)
 			goto ecpf_err;
-		if (mlx5_core_ec_sriov_enabled(esw->dev)) {
-			ret = mlx5_eswitch_load_ec_vf_vports(esw, esw->esw_funcs.num_ec_vfs,
-							     enabled_events);
-			if (ret)
-				goto ec_vf_err;
-		}
+	}
+
+	/* Enable ECVF vports */
+	if (mlx5_core_ec_sriov_enabled(esw->dev)) {
+		ret = mlx5_eswitch_load_ec_vf_vports(esw,
+						     esw->esw_funcs.num_ec_vfs,
+						     enabled_events);
+		if (ret)
+			goto ec_vf_err;
 	}
 
 	/* Enable VF vports */
@@ -1331,9 +1334,11 @@ void mlx5_eswitch_disable_pf_vf_vports(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
 {
 	mlx5_eswitch_unload_vf_vports(esw, esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs);
 
+	if (mlx5_core_ec_sriov_enabled(esw->dev))
+		mlx5_eswitch_unload_ec_vf_vports(esw,
+						 esw->esw_funcs.num_ec_vfs);
+
 	if (mlx5_ecpf_vport_exists(esw->dev)) {
-		if (mlx5_core_ec_sriov_enabled(esw->dev))
-			mlx5_eswitch_unload_ec_vf_vports(esw, esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs);
 		mlx5_eswitch_unload_pf_vf_vport(esw, MLX5_VPORT_ECPF);
 	}
 
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-10 15:15 [PATCH net 0/9] mlx5 misc fixes 2025-06-10 Mark Bloch
2025-06-10 15:15 ` [PATCH net 1/9] net/mlx5: Ensure fw pages are always allocated on same NUMA Mark Bloch
2025-06-13 16:22   ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-06-15  5:55     ` Moshe Shemesh
2025-06-15 14:44       ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-06-19 16:31         ` Moshe Shemesh
2025-06-10 15:15 ` Mark Bloch [this message]
2025-06-10 15:15 ` [PATCH net 3/9] net/mlx5: Fix return value when searching for existing flow group Mark Bloch
2025-06-10 15:15 ` [PATCH net 4/9] net/mlx5: HWS, Init mutex on the correct path Mark Bloch
2025-06-10 15:15 ` [PATCH net 5/9] net/mlx5: HWS, fix missing ip_version handling in definer Mark Bloch
2025-06-10 15:15 ` [PATCH net 6/9] net/mlx5: HWS, make sure the uplink is the last destination Mark Bloch
2025-06-10 15:15 ` [PATCH net 7/9] net/mlx5e: Properly access RCU protected qdisc_sleeping variable Mark Bloch
2025-06-11 21:40   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-12  7:31     ` Mark Bloch
2025-06-12 14:22       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-12 14:47         ` Mark Bloch
2025-06-10 15:15 ` [PATCH net 8/9] net/mlx5e: Fix leak of Geneve TLV option object Mark Bloch
2025-06-10 15:15 ` [PATCH net 9/9] net/mlx5e: Fix number of lanes to UNKNOWN when using data_rate_oper Mark Bloch
2025-06-11 21:43 ` [PATCH net 0/9] mlx5 misc fixes 2025-06-10 Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-11 21:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250610151514.1094735-3-mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --to=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=amirtz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=danielj@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®