mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux trace kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] x86: alternative: Invalidate the cache for updated instructions
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:21:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250611092110.f285e7943666941dfa3b29d3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610115030.0d60da65@gandalf.local.home>

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:50:30 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 23:47:48 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Maybe one possible scenario is to hit the int3 after the third step
> > somehow (on I-cache).
> > 
> > ------
> > <CPU0>					<CPU1>
> > 					Start smp_text_poke_batch_finish().
> > 					Start the third step. (remove INT3)
> > 					on_each_cpu(do_sync_core)
> > do_sync_core(do SERIALIZE)
> > 					Finish the third step.
> > Hit INT3 (from I-cache)
> > 					Clear text_poke_array_refs[cpu0]
> > Start smp_text_poke_int3_handler()
> 
> I believe your analysis is the issue here. The commit that changed the ref
> counter from a global to per cpu didn't cause the issue, it just made the
> race window bigger.

Agreed. That is a suspicious commit, but even though, as you said
it might just cause the bug easier. Here I wrote refcount as a
per-cpu array because of showing the current code.

> 
> > Failed to get text_poke_array_refs[cpu0]
> > Oops: int3
> > ------
> > 
> > SERIALIZE instruction flashes pipeline, thus the processor needs
> > to reload the instruction. But it is not ensured to reload it from
> > memory because SERIALIZE does not invalidate the cache.
> > 
> > To prevent reloading replaced INT3, we need to invalidate the cache
> > (flush TLB) in the third step, before the do_sync_core().
> > 
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYsLu0roY3DV=tKyqP7FEKbOEETRvTDhnpPxJGbA=Cg+4w@mail.gmail.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c |   10 +++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> > index ecfe7b497cad..1b606db48017 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> > @@ -2949,8 +2949,16 @@ void smp_text_poke_batch_finish(void)
> >  		do_sync++;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (do_sync)
> > +	if (do_sync) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Flush the instructions on the cache, then serialize the
> > +		 * pipeline of each CPU.
> 
> The IPI interrupt should flush the cache. And the TLB should not be an
> issue here. If anything, this may work just because it will make the race
> smaller. 

I'm not sure, I'm searching it in the Intel SDM.

> 
> I'm thinking this may be a QEMU bug. If QEMU doesn't flush the icache on an
> IPI then this would indeed be an problem.

Does the qemu manage its icache? (Is that possible to manage it?)
And I guess it is using KVM to run VM, thus the actual cache or TLB
operation has been done by KVM.

Thanks,

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> > +		 */
> > +		flush_tlb_kernel_range((unsigned long)text_poke_addr(&text_poke_array.vec[0]),
> > +				       (unsigned long)text_poke_addr(text_poke_array.vec +
> > +								text_poke_array.nr_entries - 1));
> >  		smp_text_poke_sync_each_cpu();
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Remove and wait for refs to be zero.
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-11  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-05 11:42 next-20250605: Test regression: qemu-x86_64-compat mode ltp tracing Oops int3 kernel panic Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-09 13:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-10  8:41   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-10 13:25     ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-10 13:20   ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-10 14:43     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-10 14:47       ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] x86: Retry with new instruction if INT3 is disappaered Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2025-06-10 14:47       ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] x86: alternative: Invalidate the cache for updated instructions Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2025-06-10 15:50         ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-11  0:21           ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2025-06-11 10:26           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-11 14:20             ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-11 15:42               ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-12  0:04                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-11 11:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-12  0:17           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-12 16:24             ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-13  3:09               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-10 14:53     ` next-20250605: Test regression: qemu-x86_64-compat mode ltp tracing Oops int3 kernel panic Steven Rostedt
2025-06-12 13:09       ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-13  8:27         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-13 12:01           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-16  7:36           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-17 10:41             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-17 12:10               ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-17 12:25                 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-17 12:31                   ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-17 14:29               ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-17 23:40                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-19 14:00                   ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-17 16:45               ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-17 23:05                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-17 23:32                   ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-10  0:29 ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250611092110.f285e7943666941dfa3b29d3@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®