From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
zide.chen@intel.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 11/12] perf/x86: Add SSP in extended regs
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 06:49:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250613134943.3186517-12-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250613134943.3186517-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Support SSP as the extended registers. It can be configured in the
sample_ext_regs_intr/user.
Only the PMU with PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS2 supports the feature.
The value can be retrieved via the XSAVES.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 7 +++++++
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 5 +++++
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 +++++-
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 5 +++++
5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 9bcef9a32dd2..65e4460fdc28 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -441,6 +441,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask)
sizeof(struct avx_512_zmm_uppers_state));
__x86_pmu_get_regs(XFEATURE_MASK_Hi16_ZMM, perf_regs->h16zmm_regs,
sizeof(struct avx_512_hi16_state));
+ __x86_pmu_get_regs(XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER, perf_regs->cet_regs,
+ sizeof(struct cet_user_state));
}
static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void)
@@ -476,6 +478,8 @@ static void reserve_ext_regs_buffers(void)
size += sizeof(struct avx_512_zmm_uppers_state);
if (x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & BIT_ULL(X86_EXT_REGS_H16ZMM))
size += sizeof(struct avx_512_hi16_state);
+ if (x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & BIT_ULL(X86_EXT_REGS_CET))
+ size += sizeof(struct cet_user_state);
/* XSAVE feature requires 64-byte alignment. */
size += 64;
@@ -757,6 +761,7 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
check_ext_regs(X86_EXT_REGS_OPMASK);
check_ext_regs(X86_EXT_REGS_ZMMH);
check_ext_regs(X86_EXT_REGS_H16ZMM);
+ check_ext_regs(X86_EXT_REGS_CET);
}
}
return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
@@ -1866,6 +1871,8 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
XFEATURE_MASK_ZMM_Hi256, PERF_X86_EXT_REG_ZMMH_SIZE);
init_ext_regs_data(X86_EXT_REGS_H16ZMM, perf_regs->h16zmm_regs,
XFEATURE_MASK_Hi16_ZMM, PERF_X86_EXT_REG_H16ZMM_SIZE);
+ init_ext_regs_data(X86_EXT_REGS_CET, perf_regs->cet_regs,
+ XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER, PERF_X86_EXT_REG_SSP_SIZE);
mask &= ~ignore_mask;
if (mask)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 93a65c529afe..e4906c0b33da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ enum {
X86_EXT_REGS_OPMASK,
X86_EXT_REGS_ZMMH,
X86_EXT_REGS_H16ZMM,
+ X86_EXT_REGS_CET,
};
#define PERF_PEBS_DATA_SOURCE_MAX 0x100
@@ -1345,6 +1346,10 @@ static inline int get_num_ext_regs(u64 *ext_regs, unsigned int type)
mask = GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_EXT_REGS_64, PERF_REG_X86_ZMM16);
mask2 = GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_ZMM31 - 64, 0);
return hweight64(ext_regs[0] & mask) + hweight64(ext_regs[1] & mask2);
+ case X86_EXT_REGS_CET:
+ if (ext_regs[1] & BIT_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_SSP - 64))
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
default:
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index eb35ba9afbb4..e49a26886e64 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
u64 *opmask_regs;
u64 *zmmh_regs;
u64 *h16zmm_regs;
+ u64 *cet_regs;
};
extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index c43a025b0c01..82df5c65d701 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -138,8 +138,11 @@ enum perf_event_x86_ext_regs {
PERF_REG_X86_ZMM30,
PERF_REG_X86_ZMM31,
+ /* shadow stack pointer (SSP) */
+ PERF_REG_X86_SSP,
+
PERF_REG_X86_EXT_REGS_64 = PERF_REG_X86_ZMM23,
- PERF_REG_X86_EXT_REGS_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_ZMM31,
+ PERF_REG_X86_EXT_REGS_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_SSP,
};
enum perf_event_x86_ext_reg_size {
@@ -148,6 +151,7 @@ enum perf_event_x86_ext_reg_size {
PERF_X86_EXT_REG_OPMASK_SIZE = 1,
PERF_X86_EXT_REG_ZMMH_SIZE = 4,
PERF_X86_EXT_REG_H16ZMM_SIZE = 8,
+ PERF_X86_EXT_REG_SSP_SIZE = 1,
/* max of PERF_REG_X86_XXX_SIZE */
PERF_X86_EXT_REG_SIZE_MAX = PERF_X86_EXT_REG_H16ZMM_SIZE,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index d5721ea85c5d..6a5936ed7143 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -102,6 +102,11 @@ static u64 perf_ext_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx,
idx - PERF_REG_X86_ZMM16,
perf_regs->h16zmm_regs,
PERF_X86_EXT_REG_H16ZMM_SIZE);
+ case PERF_REG_X86_SSP:
+ return __perf_ext_reg_value(ext, ext_size,
+ idx - PERF_REG_X86_SSP,
+ &perf_regs->cet_regs[1],
+ PERF_X86_EXT_REG_SSP_SIZE);
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
*ext_size = 0;
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-13 13:49 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Support vector and more extended registers in perf kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] perf/x86: Setup the regs data kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi kan.liang
2025-06-13 14:39 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 14:54 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 15:19 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] perf: Move has_extended_regs() to header file kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] perf/x86: Support XMM register for non-PEBS and REGS_USER kan.liang
2025-06-13 15:15 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 17:51 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 15:34 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 18:14 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] perf: Support extension of sample_regs kan.liang
2025-06-17 8:00 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 9:49 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 12:14 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 14:24 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-17 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 14:55 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-17 19:00 ` Mark Brown
2025-06-17 20:32 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 10:10 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 13:52 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 14:30 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-18 14:47 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-18 15:24 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 15:22 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] perf/x86: Add YMMH in extended regs kan.liang
2025-06-13 15:48 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] perf/x86: Add APX " kan.liang
2025-06-13 16:02 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 17:17 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-17 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] perf/x86: Add OPMASK " kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] perf/x86: Add ZMM " kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` kan.liang [this message]
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] perf/x86/intel: Support extended registers kan.liang
2025-06-17 7:50 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] Support vector and more extended registers in perf Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 13:52 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-17 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 15:23 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-17 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 0:57 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-18 10:47 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 12:28 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-18 13:15 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-19 0:41 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-19 11:11 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-19 12:26 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-19 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 14:27 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250613134943.3186517-12-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®