From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: "Nirujogi, Pratap" <pnirujog@amd.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Hao Yao <hao.yao@intel.com>,
Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@amd.com>,
mchehab@kernel.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org, krzk@kernel.org,
dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com, tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
benjamin.chan@amd.com, bin.du@amd.com, grosikop@amd.com,
king.li@amd.com, dantony@amd.com, vengutta@amd.com,
dongcheng.yan@intel.com, jason.z.chen@intel.com,
jimmy.su@intel.com, Svetoslav.Stoilov@amd.com,
Yana.Zheleva@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND] media: i2c: Add OV05C10 camera sensor driver
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 01:11:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250623221125.GC15951@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ca1c306-ab79-4a4e-a8a8-1e1f691ae720@amd.com>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 05:53:44PM -0400, Nirujogi, Pratap wrote:
> On 6/23/2025 8:06 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:27:39AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 01:52:57AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>>>>> +#define OV05C10_REF_CLK (24 * HZ_PER_MHZ)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Seems your module use 24 MHz clock input. The Dell's modules always use
> >>>>> 19.2MHz, which means your the PLL settings will not work on Dell's.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is ok as further work. Please send a patch. :-)
> >>>
> >>> The patch should calculate PLL configuration dynamically, perhaps using
> >>> the ccs-pll calculator if applicable.
> >>
> >> As much as I do like your suggestion, I don't think it's really feasible to
> >> often do this for Omnivision sensors (most others largely do just work
> >> without much hassle wrt. PLL, as long as a PLL calculator exists). This
> >> sensor's PLL tree is different from CCS and badly documented, as expected.
> >
> > How much do we know about the PLL structure ?
>
> sorry to inform we don't have much details, we've consulted with the
> sensor vendor, but they are not willing to share specifics regarding the
> PLL calculations, register details, or configuration settings. They have
> recommended reaching out to them directly for any PLL configurations
> required for the modes we intend to support.
Do you have access to the sensor datasheet ?
> >>>>> Seems there are already several camera sensors using page-based registers.
> >>>>> Is it a good idea to add page support in CCI interface?
> >>>>
> >>>> Sounds like a good idea as such but I'm not sure how common this really is,
> >>>> I think I've seen a few Omnivision sensors doing this. If implemented, I
> >>>> think it would be nice if the page could be encoded in the register address
> >>>> which V4L2 CCI would store and switch page if needed only. This would
> >>>> require serialising accesses, too. There's some room in CCI register raw
> >>>> value space so this could be done without even changing that, say, with
> >>>> 8-bit page and 8-bit register address.
> >>>
> >>> Ack. I've worked on a driver for the AP1302 external ISP, which also
> >>> uses pages registers. The full address space spans 32 bits though, but
> >>> fortunately the driver doesn't need to access anything above 0x00ffffff.
> >>
> >> 0xffffff?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >> The current CCI register addresses are limited to 16 bits. To
> >> support that, we'd need to use u64 most likely.
> >
> > I handled it in the ap1302 driver, by using bits 31:24 of address to
> > store a 8 bits page value. It's a hack as the CCI helper currently only
> > allocates 4 bits of the address to driver-specific purpose.
> >
> >> For 16-bit register
> >> addresses and 8-bit values which probably are the most common, that starts
> >> to appear a bit wasteful.
> >
> > It is wasteful, I don't want to turn the register address to a 64-bit
> > value.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 19:42 Pratap Nirujogi
2025-06-13 4:55 ` Hao Yao
2025-06-13 11:02 ` Kieran Bingham
2025-06-13 12:05 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-06-16 23:15 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-16 23:46 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-28 19:23 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-06-13 22:02 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-06-14 22:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-16 22:33 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-29 7:40 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-06-30 22:31 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-07-02 6:08 ` Yan, Dongcheng
2025-07-02 6:12 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-07-02 16:47 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-07-03 6:24 ` Yan, Dongcheng
2025-07-05 11:45 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-07-06 9:11 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-07-08 15:31 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-23 11:27 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-06-23 12:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-23 21:53 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-23 22:11 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2025-06-16 23:12 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-23 12:09 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-23 13:22 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-06-23 13:42 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-23 21:55 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-23 22:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-23 23:21 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-25 22:06 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-26 11:11 ` Kieran Bingham
2025-06-26 12:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-26 18:22 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-26 18:56 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-26 19:21 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-26 18:14 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-17 0:19 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-15 0:09 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-16 22:49 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-23 21:51 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-23 22:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-23 23:28 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-24 0:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-24 18:49 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-24 19:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-24 19:49 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-24 8:35 ` Mehdi Djait
2025-06-24 10:19 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-06-24 10:20 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-06-24 10:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-24 11:27 ` Mehdi Djait
2025-06-24 11:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-06-24 11:46 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-06-24 16:34 ` Mehdi Djait
2025-06-24 20:24 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-25 6:11 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-06-24 18:26 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2025-06-24 20:01 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-15 22:41 Pratap Nirujogi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250623221125.GC15951@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=Svetoslav.Stoilov@amd.com \
--cc=Yana.Zheleva@amd.com \
--cc=benjamin.chan@amd.com \
--cc=bin.du@amd.com \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=dantony@amd.com \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=dongcheng.yan@intel.com \
--cc=grosikop@amd.com \
--cc=hao.yao@intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=jason.z.chen@intel.com \
--cc=jimmy.su@intel.com \
--cc=king.li@amd.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=pnirujog@amd.com \
--cc=pratap.nirujogi@amd.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=vengutta@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®