From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Jiwei Sun <sjiwei@163.com>
Cc: macro@orcam.me.uk, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de,
ahuang12@lenovo.com, sunjw10@lenovo.com, jiwei.sun.bj@qq.com,
sunjw10@outlook.com, Andrew <andreasx0@protonmail.com>,
Matthew W Carlis <mattc@purestorage.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] PCI: Fix the issue of failed speed limit lifting
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:54:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250624205441.GA1528511@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250123055155.22648-1-sjiwei@163.com>
[+cc Andrew, Matthew, Sathy]
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 01:51:53PM +0800, Jiwei Sun wrote:
> From: Jiwei Sun <sunjw10@lenovo.com>
>
> Since commit de9a6c8d5dbf ("PCI/bwctrl: Add pcie_set_target_speed() to set
> PCIe Link Speed"), there are two potential issues in the function
> pcie_failed_link_retrain().
>
> (1) The macro PCIE_LNKCTL2_TLS2SPEED() and PCIE_LNKCAP_SLS2SPEED() just
> use the link speed field of the registers. However, there are many other
> different function fields in the Link Control 2 Register or the Link
> Capabilities Register. If the register value is directly used by the two
> macros, it may cause getting an error link speed value (PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN).
>
> (2) In the pcie_failed_link_retrain(), the local variable lnkctl2 is not
> changed after reading from PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2. It might cause that the
> removing 2.5GT/s downstream link speed restriction codes are not executed.
>
> In order to avoid the above-mentioned potential issues, only keep link
> speed field of the two registers before using and reread the Link Control 2
> Register before using.
>
> This series focuses on the first patch of the original series [1]. The
> second one of the original series will submitted via the other single
> patch.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/tencent_DD9CBE5B44210B43A04EF8DAF52506A08509@qq.com/
> ---
> v4 changes:
> - rename the variable name in the macro
>
> v3 changes:
> - add fix tag in the commit messages of first patch
> - add an empty line after the local variable definition in the macro
> - adjust the position of reading the Link Control 2 register in the code
>
> v2 changes:
> - divide the two issues into different patches
> - get fixed inside the macros
>
> Jiwei Sun (2):
> PCI: Fix the wrong reading of register fields
> PCI: Adjust the position of reading the Link Control 2 register
>
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Sorry, this totally slipped through the cracks. I applied both of
these to pci/enumeration for v6.17.
Andrew reported tripping over this issue fixed by the first patch, and
Lukas also posted a similar patch [1] to fix it, so I updated the
commit log as below to include details of Andrew's report.
As Lukas did, I added a stable tag but made it for v6.13+ (not v6.12+)
because I think the actual problem showed up with de9a6c8d5dbf
("PCI/bwctrl: Add pcie_set_target_speed() to set PCIe Link Speed"),
not with f68dea13405c ("PCI: Revert to the original speed after PCIe
failed link retraining").
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1c92ef6bcb314ee6977839b46b393282e4f52e74.1750684771.git.lukas@wunner.de
PCI: Fix link speed calculation on retrain failure
When pcie_failed_link_retrain() fails to retrain, it tries to revert to the
previous link speed. However it calculates that speed from the Link
Control 2 register without masking out non-speed bits first.
PCIE_LNKCTL2_TLS2SPEED() converts such incorrect values to
PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN (0xff), which in turn causes a WARN splat in
pcie_set_target_speed():
pci 0000:00:01.1: [1022:14ed] type 01 class 0x060400 PCIe Root Port
pci 0000:00:01.1: broken device, retraining non-functional downstream link at 2.5GT/s
pci 0000:00:01.1: retraining failed
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at drivers/pci/pcie/bwctrl.c:168 pcie_set_target_speed
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000000000000ff RDI: ffff9acd82efa000
pcie_failed_link_retrain
pci_device_add
pci_scan_single_device
Mask out the non-speed bits in PCIE_LNKCTL2_TLS2SPEED() and
PCIE_LNKCAP_SLS2SPEED() so they don't incorrectly return PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-24 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 5:51 Jiwei Sun
2025-01-23 5:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: Fix the wrong reading of register fields Jiwei Sun
2025-01-23 5:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: Adjust the position of reading the Link Control 2 register Jiwei Sun
2025-02-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] PCI: Fix the issue of failed speed limit lifting Jiwei Sun
2025-06-24 20:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-06-24 22:07 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250624205441.GA1528511@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
--cc=andreasx0@protonmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jiwei.sun.bj@qq.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mattc@purestorage.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sjiwei@163.com \
--cc=sunjw10@lenovo.com \
--cc=sunjw10@outlook.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®