mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:TRACING),
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] trace/preemptirq: reduce overhead of irq_enable/disable tracepoints
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 19:08:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250626190854.34e45844@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250626142017.26372-2-wander@redhat.com>

On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:20:09 -0300
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com> wrote:


> @@ -197,9 +198,13 @@ extern void warn_bogus_irq_restore(void);
>   */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
>  
> +DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_enable);
> +DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_disable);
> +
>  #define local_irq_enable()				\
>  	do {						\
> -		trace_hardirqs_on();			\
> +		if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable))	\
> +			trace_hardirqs_on();		\

If you have both this and lockdep enabled, then this has to be called
regardless if tracing is enabled or not. So this should be:

		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) || \
		    tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable))


>  		raw_local_irq_enable();			\
>  	} while (0)
>  
> @@ -207,28 +212,32 @@ extern void warn_bogus_irq_restore(void);
>  	do {						\
>  		bool was_disabled = raw_irqs_disabled();\
>  		raw_local_irq_disable();		\
> -		if (!was_disabled)			\
> +		if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_disable) &&	\
> +		    !was_disabled)			\

And this should be:

		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) || \
		    (tracepoint_enabled(irq_disable) && \
		     !was_disabled))


>  			trace_hardirqs_off();		\
>  	} while (0)
>  
>  #define local_irq_save(flags)				\
>  	do {						\
>  		raw_local_irq_save(flags);		\
> -		if (!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))	\
> +		if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_disable) &&	\
> +		    !raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))	\
>  			trace_hardirqs_off();		\
>  	} while (0)
>  
>  #define local_irq_restore(flags)			\
>  	do {						\
> -		if (!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))	\
> +		if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable) &&	\
> +		    !raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))	\
>  			trace_hardirqs_on();		\

Same with these.

-- Steve

>  		raw_local_irq_restore(flags);		\
>  	} while (0)
>  
> -#define safe_halt()				\
> -	do {					\
> -		trace_hardirqs_on();		\
> -		raw_safe_halt();		\
> +#define safe_halt()					\
> +	do {						\
> +		if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable))	\
> +			trace_hardirqs_on();		\
> +		raw_safe_halt();			\
>  	} while (0)
>  
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> index 0c42b15c3800..90ee65db4516 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ void trace_hardirqs_off(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_off);
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_off);
> +
> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(irq_disable);
> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(irq_enable);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_PREEMPT_TOGGLE


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-26 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-26 14:20 [PATCH 0/2] tracing/preemptirq: Optimize disabled tracepoint overhead Wander Lairson Costa
2025-06-26 14:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] trace/preemptirq: reduce overhead of irq_enable/disable tracepoints Wander Lairson Costa
2025-06-26 23:08   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2025-06-27 22:10   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-26 14:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing/preemptirq: Optimize preempt_disable/enable() tracepoint overhead Wander Lairson Costa
2025-06-27 21:59   ` kernel test robot
2025-06-28 14:39   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250626190854.34e45844@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wander@redhat.com \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®