From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/preemptirq: Optimize preempt_disable/enable() tracepoint overhead
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 22:39:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202506282232.13AjjGxr-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250626142017.26372-3-wander@redhat.com>
Hi Wander,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on trace/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on tip/sched/core linus/master v6.16-rc3 next-20250627]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wander-Lairson-Costa/trace-preemptirq-reduce-overhead-of-irq_enable-disable-tracepoints/20250626-222438
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250626142017.26372-3-wander%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/preemptirq: Optimize preempt_disable/enable() tracepoint overhead
config: sparc64-randconfig-001-20250628 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250628/202506282232.13AjjGxr-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250628/202506282232.13AjjGxr-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506282232.13AjjGxr-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/asm-generic/cmpxchg-local.h:6,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/cmpxchg_64.h:111,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:5,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic_64.h:12,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h:5,
from include/linux/atomic.h:7,
from include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h:11,
from include/linux/preempt.h:13,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from kernel/resource.c:17:
include/linux/irqflags.h:201:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_enable);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:201:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DECLARE_TRACEPOINT' [-Werror=implicit-int]
>> include/linux/irqflags.h:201:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
include/linux/irqflags.h:202:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_disable);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:202:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DECLARE_TRACEPOINT' [-Werror=implicit-int]
include/linux/irqflags.h:202:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:11,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from kernel/resource.c:17:
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irq_destructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:206:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'tracepoint_enabled'; did you mean 'local_irq_enable'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable)) \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:47: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_enable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:206:26: error: 'irq_enable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable)) \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:47: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_enable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:206:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable)) \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:47: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_enable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irq_constructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:215:26: error: 'irq_disable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_disable) && \
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:403:2: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
_lock; \
^~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:26: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_disable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irqsave_destructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:230:26: error: 'irq_enable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable) && \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:275:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irqsave,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:277:7: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_restore'
local_irq_restore(_T->flags),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irqsave_constructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:223:26: error: 'irq_disable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_disable) && \
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:403:2: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
_lock; \
^~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:275:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irqsave,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:276:7: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_save'
local_irq_save(_T->flags),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/static_key.h:1,
from include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h:12,
from include/linux/preempt.h:13,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from kernel/resource.c:17:
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h: In function '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave':
include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h:92:27: error: '__tracepoint_irq_disable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'raw_local_irq_disable'?
static_branch_unlikely(&(__tracepoint_##tp).key)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/jump_label.h:503:43: note: in definition of macro 'static_branch_unlikely'
--
In file included from include/asm-generic/cmpxchg-local.h:6,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/cmpxchg_64.h:111,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:5,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic_64.h:12,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h:5,
from include/linux/atomic.h:7,
from include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h:11,
from include/linux/preempt.h:13,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from kernel/fork.c:16:
include/linux/irqflags.h:201:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_enable);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:201:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DECLARE_TRACEPOINT' [-Werror=implicit-int]
>> include/linux/irqflags.h:201:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
include/linux/irqflags.h:202:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_disable);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:202:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DECLARE_TRACEPOINT' [-Werror=implicit-int]
include/linux/irqflags.h:202:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:11,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from kernel/fork.c:16:
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irq_destructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:206:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'tracepoint_enabled'; did you mean 'local_irq_enable'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable)) \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:47: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_enable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:206:26: error: 'irq_enable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable)) \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:47: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_enable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:206:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable)) \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:47: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_enable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irq_constructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:215:26: error: 'irq_disable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_disable) && \
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:403:2: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
_lock; \
^~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:26: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_disable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irqsave_destructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:230:26: error: 'irq_enable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable) && \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:275:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irqsave,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:277:7: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_restore'
local_irq_restore(_T->flags),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irqsave_constructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:223:26: error: 'irq_disable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_disable) && \
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:403:2: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
_lock; \
^~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:275:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irqsave,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:276:7: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_save'
local_irq_save(_T->flags),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/static_key.h:1,
from include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h:12,
from include/linux/preempt.h:13,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/slab.h:16,
from kernel/fork.c:16:
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h: In function '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave':
include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h:92:27: error: '__tracepoint_irq_disable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'raw_local_irq_disable'?
static_branch_unlikely(&(__tracepoint_##tp).key)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/jump_label.h:503:43: note: in definition of macro 'static_branch_unlikely'
--
In file included from include/asm-generic/cmpxchg-local.h:6,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/cmpxchg_64.h:111,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:5,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic_64.h:12,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic.h:5,
from include/linux/atomic.h:7,
from include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h:11,
from include/linux/preempt.h:13,
from include/linux/alloc_tag.h:11,
from include/linux/rhashtable-types.h:12,
from include/linux/ipc.h:7,
from include/uapi/linux/sem.h:5,
from include/linux/sem.h:5,
from include/linux/compat.h:14,
from kernel/compat.c:12:
include/linux/irqflags.h:201:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_enable);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:201:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DECLARE_TRACEPOINT' [-Werror=implicit-int]
>> include/linux/irqflags.h:201:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
include/linux/irqflags.h:202:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_disable);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:202:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DECLARE_TRACEPOINT' [-Werror=implicit-int]
include/linux/irqflags.h:202:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
In file included from include/linux/jump_label.h:78,
from include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:6,
from include/linux/printk.h:616,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/bug.h:25,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/alloc_tag.h:8,
from include/linux/rhashtable-types.h:12,
from include/linux/ipc.h:7,
from include/uapi/linux/sem.h:5,
from include/linux/sem.h:5,
from include/linux/compat.h:14,
from kernel/compat.c:12:
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irq_destructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:206:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'tracepoint_enabled'; did you mean 'static_key_enabled'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable)) \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:47: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_enable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:206:26: error: 'irq_enable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ctl_table'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable)) \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:47: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_enable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:206:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable)) \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:47: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_enable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irq_constructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:215:26: error: 'irq_disable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_disable) && \
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:403:2: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
_lock; \
^~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:274:26: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_disable'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irq, local_irq_disable(), local_irq_enable())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irqsave_destructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:230:26: error: 'irq_enable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'ctl_table'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_enable) && \
^~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:385:18: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_UNLOCK_GUARD'
if (_T->lock) { _unlock; } \
^~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:275:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irqsave,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:277:7: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_restore'
local_irq_restore(_T->flags),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h: In function 'class_irqsave_constructor':
include/linux/irqflags.h:223:26: error: 'irq_disable' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'irqs_disabled'?
if (tracepoint_enabled(irq_disable) && \
^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/cleanup.h:403:2: note: in definition of macro '__DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
_lock; \
^~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:275:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0'
DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(irqsave,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/irqflags.h:276:7: note: in expansion of macro 'local_irq_save'
local_irq_save(_T->flags),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:6,
from include/linux/printk.h:616,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22,
from arch/sparc/include/asm/bug.h:25,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/alloc_tag.h:8,
..
vim +201 include/linux/irqflags.h
00b0ed2d4997af Peter Zijlstra 2020-08-12 200
563d10fd41452f Wander Lairson Costa 2025-06-26 @201 DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_enable);
563d10fd41452f Wander Lairson Costa 2025-06-26 202 DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(irq_disable);
563d10fd41452f Wander Lairson Costa 2025-06-26 203
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-28 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-26 14:20 [PATCH 0/2] tracing/preemptirq: Optimize disabled " Wander Lairson Costa
2025-06-26 14:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] trace/preemptirq: reduce overhead of irq_enable/disable tracepoints Wander Lairson Costa
2025-06-26 23:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-27 22:10 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-26 14:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing/preemptirq: Optimize preempt_disable/enable() tracepoint overhead Wander Lairson Costa
2025-06-27 21:59 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-28 14:39 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202506282232.13AjjGxr-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wander@redhat.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®