From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/3] rcu: Refactor expedited handling check in rcu_read_unlock_special()
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 16:39:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250705203918.4149863-2-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250705203918.4149863-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Extract the complex expedited handling condition in rcu_read_unlock_special()
into a separate function rcu_unlock_needs_exp_handling() with detailed
comments explaining each condition.
This improves code readability. No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index baf57745b42f..8504d95bb35b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -647,6 +647,72 @@ static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler(struct irq_work *iwp)
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
+/*
+ * Check if expedited grace period processing during unlock is needed.
+ *
+ * This function determines whether expedited handling is required based on:
+ * 1. Task blocking an expedited grace period
+ * 2. CPU participating in an expedited grace period
+ * 3. Strict grace period mode requiring expedited handling
+ * 4. RCU priority boosting needs when interrupts were disabled
+ *
+ * @t: The task being checked
+ * @rdp: The per-CPU RCU data
+ * @rnp: The RCU node for this CPU
+ * @irqs_were_disabled: Whether interrupts were disabled before rcu_read_unlock()
+ *
+ * Returns true if expedited processing of the rcu_read_unlock() is needed.
+ */
+static bool rcu_unlock_needs_exp_handling(struct task_struct *t,
+ struct rcu_data *rdp,
+ struct rcu_node *rnp,
+ bool irqs_were_disabled)
+{
+ /*
+ * Check if this task is blocking an expedited grace period.
+ * If the task was preempted within an RCU read-side critical section
+ * and is on the expedited grace period blockers list (exp_tasks),
+ * we need expedited handling to unblock the expedited GP.
+ */
+ if (t->rcu_blocked_node && READ_ONCE(t->rcu_blocked_node->exp_tasks))
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * Check if this CPU is participating in an expedited grace period.
+ * The expmask bitmap tracks which CPUs need to check in for the
+ * current expedited GP. If our CPU's bit is set, we need expedited
+ * handling to help complete the expedited GP.
+ */
+ if (rdp->grpmask & READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask))
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * In CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y kernels, all grace periods
+ * are treated as short for testing purposes even if that means
+ * disturbing the system more. Check if either:
+ * - This CPU has not yet reported a quiescent state, or
+ * - This task was preempted within an RCU critical section
+ * In either case, requird expedited handling for strict GP mode.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) &&
+ ((rdp->grpmask & READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask)) || t->rcu_blocked_node))
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * RCU priority boosting case: If a task is subject to RCU priority
+ * boosting and exits an RCU read-side critical section with interrupts
+ * disabled, we need expedited handling to ensure timely deboosting.
+ * Without this, a low-priority task could incorrectly run at high
+ * real-time priority for an extended period effecting real-time
+ * responsiveness. This applies to all CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y kernels,
+ * not just PREEMPT_RT.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST) && irqs_were_disabled && t->rcu_blocked_node)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* Handle special cases during rcu_read_unlock(), such as needing to
* notify RCU core processing or task having blocked during the RCU
@@ -666,18 +732,14 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
local_irq_save(flags);
irqs_were_disabled = irqs_disabled_flags(flags);
if (preempt_bh_were_disabled || irqs_were_disabled) {
- bool expboost; // Expedited GP in flight or possible boosting.
+ bool needs_exp; // Expedited handling needed.
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
- expboost = (t->rcu_blocked_node && READ_ONCE(t->rcu_blocked_node->exp_tasks)) ||
- (rdp->grpmask & READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask)) ||
- (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) &&
- ((rdp->grpmask & READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask)) || t->rcu_blocked_node)) ||
- (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST) && irqs_were_disabled &&
- t->rcu_blocked_node);
+ needs_exp = rcu_unlock_needs_exp_handling(t, rdp, rnp, irqs_were_disabled);
+
// Need to defer quiescent state until everything is enabled.
- if (use_softirq && (in_hardirq() || (expboost && !irqs_were_disabled))) {
+ if (use_softirq && (in_hardirq() || (needs_exp && !irqs_were_disabled))) {
// Using softirq, safe to awaken, and either the
// wakeup is free or there is either an expedited
// GP in flight or a potential need to deboost.
@@ -690,7 +752,7 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
set_tsk_need_resched(current);
set_preempt_need_resched();
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK) && irqs_were_disabled &&
- expboost && rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending != DEFER_QS_PENDING && cpu_online(rdp->cpu)) {
+ needs_exp && rdp->defer_qs_iw_pending != DEFER_QS_PENDING && cpu_online(rdp->cpu)) {
// Get scheduler to re-evaluate and call hooks.
// If !IRQ_WORK, FQS scan will eventually IPI.
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) &&
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-05 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-05 20:39 [PATCH RFC 1/3] rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work Joel Fernandes
2025-07-05 20:39 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2025-07-06 17:18 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] rcu: Refactor expedited handling check in rcu_read_unlock_special() Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-06 19:16 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-07-07 4:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-05 20:39 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] rcu: Remove redundant check for irq state during unlock Joel Fernandes
2025-07-05 20:41 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work Joel Fernandes
2025-07-06 17:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-06 17:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-07-06 17:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-06 18:37 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-07-07 13:26 ` qiang.zhang
2025-07-07 14:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-07-07 14:51 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250705203918.4149863-2-joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--to=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®