From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Yun Lu <luyun_611@163.com>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] af_packet: fix the SO_SNDTIMEO constraint not effective on tpacked_snd()
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 19:15:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250709181502.GI721198@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250709095653.62469-2-luyun_611@163.com>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 05:56:52PM +0800, Yun Lu wrote:
> From: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
>
> Due to the changes in commit 581073f626e3 ("af_packet: do not call
> packet_read_pending() from tpacket_destruct_skb()"), every time
> tpacket_destruct_skb() is executed, the skb_completion is marked as
> completed. When wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() returns
> completed, the pending_refcnt has not yet been reduced to zero.
> Therefore, when ph is NULL, the wait function may need to be called
> multiple times untill packet_read_pending() finally returns zero.
nit: until
>
> We should call sock_sndtimeo() only once, otherwise the SO_SNDTIMEO
> constraint could be way off.
>
> Fixes: 581073f626e3 ("af_packet: do not call packet_read_pending() from tpacket_destruct_skb()")
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yun Lu <luyun@kylinos.cn>
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-09 9:56 [PATCH v3 0/2] fix two issues on tpacket_snd() Yun Lu
2025-07-09 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] af_packet: fix the SO_SNDTIMEO constraint not effective on tpacked_snd() Yun Lu
2025-07-09 12:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-09 17:06 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-07-09 18:15 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-09 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] af_packet: fix soft lockup issue caused by tpacket_snd() Yun Lu
2025-07-09 12:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-10 2:18 ` luyun
2025-07-09 18:14 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-10 2:20 ` luyun
2025-07-09 21:14 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-07-10 2:36 ` luyun
2025-07-10 7:27 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250709181502.GI721198@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luyun_611@163.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®