From: luyun <luyun_611@163.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] af_packet: fix soft lockup issue caused by tpacket_snd()
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:20:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9853d3f1-569f-4fde-846e-5c8d7f798725@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250709181434.GH721198@horms.kernel.org>
在 2025/7/10 02:14, Simon Horman 写道:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 05:56:53PM +0800, Yun Lu wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -2943,14 +2953,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
>> }
>> packet_increment_head(&po->tx_ring);
>> len_sum += tp_len;
>> - } while (likely((ph != NULL) ||
>> - /* Note: packet_read_pending() might be slow if we have
>> - * to call it as it's per_cpu variable, but in fast-path
>> - * we already short-circuit the loop with the first
>> - * condition, and luckily don't have to go that path
>> - * anyway.
>> - */
>> - (need_wait && packet_read_pending(&po->tx_ring))));
>> + } while (likely(ph != NULL))
> A semicolon is needed at the end of the line above.
Sorry, this was my mistake. I will fix it in the next version.
Thank you for pointing it out.
>
>>
>> err = len_sum;
>> goto out_put;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-09 9:56 [PATCH v3 0/2] fix two issues on tpacket_snd() Yun Lu
2025-07-09 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] af_packet: fix the SO_SNDTIMEO constraint not effective on tpacked_snd() Yun Lu
2025-07-09 12:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-09 17:06 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-07-09 18:15 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-09 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] af_packet: fix soft lockup issue caused by tpacket_snd() Yun Lu
2025-07-09 12:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-10 2:18 ` luyun
2025-07-09 18:14 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-10 2:20 ` luyun [this message]
2025-07-09 21:14 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-07-10 2:36 ` luyun
2025-07-10 7:27 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9853d3f1-569f-4fde-846e-5c8d7f798725@163.com \
--to=luyun_611@163.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®