From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] netconsole: add support for strings with new line in netpoll_parse_ip_addr
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:42:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250725134224.0a2da8e7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250723-netconsole_ref-v3-3-8be9b24e4a99@debian.org>
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:20:31 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> const char *end;
> + int len;
>
> - if (!strchr(str, ':') &&
> - in4_pton(str, -1, (void *)addr, -1, &end) > 0) {
> - if (!*end)
> - return 0;
> - }
> - if (in6_pton(str, -1, addr->in6.s6_addr, -1, &end) > 0) {
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> - if (!*end)
> - return 1;
> -#else
> + len = strlen(str);
> + if (!len)
> return -1;
> -#endif
> - }
> +
> + if (str[len - 1] == '\n')
> + len -= 1;
> +
> + if (in4_pton(str, len, (void *)addr, -1, &end) > 0)
> + return 0;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) &&
> + in6_pton(str, len, addr->in6.s6_addr, -1, &end) > 0)
> + return 1;
> return -1;
Looks like we're removing the validation for reaching the end of
the buffer? This should at least be explained in the commit message.
AFAICT for IPv4 for example 1.2.3.4:xyz would have been rejected,
now it's accepted. Personally I find the
if (*end && *end != '\n')
removed by subsequent patch cleaner than modifying the input string.
I'll apply the first patch of the series..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-25 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-23 17:20 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] netconsole: reuse netpoll_parse_ip_addr in configfs helpers Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] netpoll: Remove unused fields from inet_addr union Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] netconsole: move netpoll_parse_ip_addr() earlier for reuse Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] netconsole: add support for strings with new line in netpoll_parse_ip_addr Breno Leitao
2025-07-25 20:42 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] netconsole: use netpoll_parse_ip_addr in local_ip_store Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 17:20 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] " Breno Leitao
2025-07-25 22:17 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] netconsole: reuse netpoll_parse_ip_addr in configfs helpers patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250725134224.0a2da8e7@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®