mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, thiago.bauermann@linaro.org,
	broonie@kernel.org, yury.khrustalev@arm.com,
	kristina.martsenko@arm.com, liaochang1@huawei.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64: uprobes: Add GCS support to uretprobes
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:12:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202508131334.FfoZQ27h-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811141010.741989-6-jeremy.linton@arm.com>

Hi Jeremy,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next tip/perf/core perf-tools/perf-tools linus/master v6.17-rc1 next-20250812]
[cannot apply to acme/perf/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jeremy-Linton/arm64-probes-Break-ret-out-from-bl-blr/20250811-221529
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250811141010.741989-6-jeremy.linton%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64: uprobes: Add GCS support to uretprobes
config: arm64-randconfig-r111-20250813 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250813/202508131334.FfoZQ27h-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.4.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250813/202508131334.FfoZQ27h-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508131334.FfoZQ27h-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr':
>> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:171:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_user_gcs'; did you mean 'put_user_gcs'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     171 |                 gcs_ret_vaddr = get_user_gcs((unsigned long __user *)gcspr, &err);
         |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                                 put_user_gcs
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +171 arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c

   157	
   158	unsigned long
   159	arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(unsigned long trampoline_vaddr,
   160					  struct pt_regs *regs)
   161	{
   162		unsigned long orig_ret_vaddr;
   163		unsigned long gcs_ret_vaddr;
   164		int err = 0;
   165		u64 gcspr;
   166	
   167		orig_ret_vaddr = procedure_link_pointer(regs);
   168	
   169		if (task_gcs_el0_enabled(current)) {
   170			gcspr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_GCSPR_EL0);
 > 171			gcs_ret_vaddr = get_user_gcs((unsigned long __user *)gcspr, &err);
   172			if (err) {
   173				force_sig(SIGSEGV);
   174				goto out;
   175			}
   176	
   177			/*
   178			 * If the LR and GCS return addr don't match, then some kind of PAC
   179			 * signing or control flow occurred since entering the probed function.
   180			 * Likely because the user is attempting to retprobe on an instruction
   181			 * that isn't a function boundary or inside a leaf function. Explicitly
   182			 * abort this retprobe because it will generate a GCS exception.
   183			 */
   184			if (gcs_ret_vaddr != orig_ret_vaddr) {
   185				orig_ret_vaddr = -1;
   186				goto out;
   187			}
   188	
   189			put_user_gcs(trampoline_vaddr, (unsigned long __user *)gcspr, &err);
   190			if (err) {
   191				force_sig(SIGSEGV);
   192				goto out;
   193			}
   194		}
   195	
   196		/* Replace the return addr with trampoline addr */
   197		procedure_link_pointer_set(regs, trampoline_vaddr);
   198	
   199	out:
   200		return orig_ret_vaddr;
   201	}
   202	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-13  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-11 14:10 [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Enable UPROBES with GCS Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] arm64: probes: Break ret out from bl/blr Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: uaccess: Move existing GCS accessors definitions to gcs.h Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] arm64: uaccess: Add additional userspace GCS accessors Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:40   ` Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] arm64: probes: Add GCS support to bl/blr/ret Jeremy Linton
2025-08-15 14:08   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64: uprobes: Add GCS support to uretprobes Jeremy Linton
2025-08-13  6:12   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-08-15 14:10     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] arm64: Kconfig: Remove GCS restrictions on UPROBES Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] uprobes: uprobe_warn should use passed task Jeremy Linton
2025-08-15 14:09   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202508131334.FfoZQ27h-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yury.khrustalev@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®