From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, thiago.bauermann@linaro.org,
broonie@kernel.org, yury.khrustalev@arm.com,
kristina.martsenko@arm.com, liaochang1@huawei.com,
will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64: uprobes: Add GCS support to uretprobes
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 15:10:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJ8_8HO37UjH1U0d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202508131334.FfoZQ27h-lkp@intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 02:12:30PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
> [also build test ERROR on perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next tip/perf/core perf-tools/perf-tools linus/master v6.17-rc1 next-20250812]
> [cannot apply to acme/perf/core]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jeremy-Linton/arm64-probes-Break-ret-out-from-bl-blr/20250811-221529
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250811141010.741989-6-jeremy.linton%40arm.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64: uprobes: Add GCS support to uretprobes
> config: arm64-randconfig-r111-20250813 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250813/202508131334.FfoZQ27h-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.4.0
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250813/202508131334.FfoZQ27h-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508131334.FfoZQ27h-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr':
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:171:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_user_gcs'; did you mean 'put_user_gcs'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 171 | gcs_ret_vaddr = get_user_gcs((unsigned long __user *)gcspr, &err);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> | put_user_gcs
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
I guess that's explained by patch 3 not being updated.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-15 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 14:10 [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: Enable UPROBES with GCS Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] arm64: probes: Break ret out from bl/blr Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] arm64: uaccess: Move existing GCS accessors definitions to gcs.h Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] arm64: uaccess: Add additional userspace GCS accessors Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:40 ` Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] arm64: probes: Add GCS support to bl/blr/ret Jeremy Linton
2025-08-15 14:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] arm64: uprobes: Add GCS support to uretprobes Jeremy Linton
2025-08-13 6:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-15 14:10 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] arm64: Kconfig: Remove GCS restrictions on UPROBES Jeremy Linton
2025-08-11 14:10 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] uprobes: uprobe_warn should use passed task Jeremy Linton
2025-08-15 14:09 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJ8_8HO37UjH1U0d@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.khrustalev@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®