mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Snyder <dansnyder@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/umip: Check that the instruction opcode is at least two bytes
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:42:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250814144217.GZ4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250808172358.1938974-2-seanjc@google.com>

On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 10:23:56AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> When checking for a potential UMIP violation on #GP, verify the decoder
> found at least two opcode bytes to avoid false positives when the kernel
> encounters an unknown instruction that starts with 0f.  Because the array
> of opcode.bytes is zero-initialized by insn_init(), peeking at bytes[1]
> will misinterpret garbage as a potential SLDT or STR instruction, and can
> incorrectly trigger emulation.
> 
> E.g. if a vpalignr instruction
> 
>    62 83 c5 05 0f 08 ff     vpalignr xmm17{k5},xmm23,XMMWORD PTR [r8],0xff
> 
> hits a #GP, the kernel emulates it as STR and squashes the #GP (and
> corrupts the userspace code stream).
> 
> Arguably the check should look for exactly two bytes, but no three byte
> opcodes use '0f 00 xx' or '0f 01 xx' as an escape, i.e. it should be
> impossible to get a false positive if the first two opcode bytes match
> '0f 00' or '0f 01'.  Go with a more conservative check with respect to the
> existing code to minimize the chances of breaking userspace, e.g. due to
> decoder weirdness.
> 
> Fixes: 1e5db223696a ("x86/umip: Add emulation code for UMIP instructions")
> Reported-by: Dan Snyder <dansnyder@google.com>
> Analyzed-by; Nick Bray <ncbray@google.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/umip.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c b/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c
> index 5a4b21389b1d..406ac01ce16d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c
> @@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ static int identify_insn(struct insn *insn)
>  	if (!insn->modrm.nbytes)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	/* All the instructions of interest start with 0x0f. */
> -	if (insn->opcode.bytes[0] != 0xf)
> +	/* The instructions of interest have 2-byte opcodes: 0F 00 or 0F 01. */
> +	if (insn->opcode.nbytes < 2 || insn->opcode.bytes[0] != 0xf)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (insn->opcode.bytes[1] == 0x1) {
> -- 
> 2.50.1.703.g449372360f-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-14 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-08 17:23 [PATCH 0/3] x86/umip: Fix UMIP insn decoder false positives Sean Christopherson
2025-08-08 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/umip: Check that the instruction opcode is at least two bytes Sean Christopherson
2025-08-14 14:42   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-09-19 18:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-19 21:24     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-20 10:07       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-09-19 19:55   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson
2025-08-08 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/umip: Fix decoding of register forms of 0F 01 (SGDT and SIDT aliases) Sean Christopherson
2025-08-14 14:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-19 19:55   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson
2025-08-08 17:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] *** DO NOT MERGE *** x86/umip: Lazy person's KUnit test for UMIP emulation Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 14:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86/umip: Fix UMIP insn decoder false positives Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 14:46   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250814144217.GZ4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dansnyder@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®