Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Update comment for hotplug memory callback priorities

[Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>]

On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 23:17:38 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 20.08.25 21:47, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > Add clarification to comment for memory hotplug callback ordering as the
> > current comment does not provide clear language on which callback happens
> > first.
> > 
> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Clearer comment suggestion from DavidH.
> > ---
> >   include/linux/memory.h | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h
> > index 40eb70ccb09d..de5c0d8e8925 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memory.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memory.h
> > @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ struct notifier_block;
> >   struct mem_section;
> >   
> >   /*
> > - * Priorities for the hotplug memory callback routines (stored in decreasing
> > - * order in the callback chain)
> > + * Priorities for the hotplug memory callback routines. Invoked from
> > + * high to low. Higher priorities corresponds to higher numbers.  
> 
> Minor nit: s/corresponds/correspond/

With that tidied up
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>

>