From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<rafael@kernel.org>, <dakr@kernel.org>, <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<marc.herbert@linux.intel.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<david@redhat.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cxl, acpi/hmat: Update CXL access coordinates directly instead of through HMAT
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 16:15:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250829161529.0000220a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250820194704.4130565-4-dave.jiang@intel.com>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 12:47:03 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
> The current implementation of CXL memory hotplug notifier gets called
> before the HMAT memory hotplug notifier. The CXL driver calculates the
> access coordinates (bandwidth and latency values) for the CXL end to
> end path (i.e. CPU to endpoint). When the CXL region is onlined, the CXL
> memory hotplug notifier writes the access coordinates to the HMAT target
> structs. Then the HMAT memory hotplug notifier is called and it creates
> the access coordinates for the node sysfs attributes.
>
> During testing on an Intel platform, it was found that although the
> newly calculated coordinates were pushed to sysfs, the sysfs attributes for
> the access coordinates showed up with the wrong initiator. The system has
> 4 nodes (0, 1, 2, 3) where node 0 and 1 are CPU nodes and node 2 and 3 are
> CXL nodes. The expectation is that node 2 would show up as a target to node
> 0:
> /sys/devices/system/node/node2/access0/initiators/node0
>
> However it was observed that node 2 showed up as a target under node 1:
> /sys/devices/system/node/node2/access0/initiators/node1
>
> The original intent of the 'ext_updated' flag in HMAT handling code was to
> stop HMAT memory hotplug callback from clobbering the access coordinates
> after CXL has injected its calculated coordinates and replaced the generic
> target access coordinates provided by the HMAT table in the HMAT target
> structs. However the flag is hacky at best and blocks the updates from
> other CXL regions that are onlined in the same node later on. Remove the
> 'ext_updated' flag usage and just update the access coordinates for the
> nodes directly without touching HMAT target data.
>
> The hotplug memory callback ordering is changed. Instead of changing CXL,
> move HMAT back so there's room for the levels rather than have CXL share
> the same level as SLAB_CALLBACK_PRI. The change will resulting in the CXL
> callback to be executed after the HMAT callback.
>
> With the change, the CXL hotplug memory notifier runs after the HMAT
> callback. The HMAT callback will create the node sysfs attributes for
> access coordinates. The CXL callback will write the access coordinates to
> the now created node sysfs attributes directly and will not pollute the
> HMAT target values.
>
> Fixes: 067353a46d8c ("cxl/region: Add memory hotplug notifier for cxl region")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Tested-by: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Add description to what was observed for the issue. (Dan)
> - Use the correct Fixes tag. (Dan)
> - Add Cc to stable. (Dan)
> - Add support to only update on first region appearance. (Jonathan)
The implementation of this seems like overkill. See later, but in short
should be able to use a nodemask_t
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index 71cc42d05248..371873fc43eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <linux/uuid.h>
> #include <linux/sort.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
> +#include <linux/xarray.h>
> #include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
> #include <cxlmem.h>
> #include <cxl.h>
> @@ -30,6 +31,9 @@
> * 3. Decoder targets
> */
>
> +/* xarray that stores the reference count per node for regions */
Reference count seems an over the top description.
I think it's just a flag that says if this happened already or not.
The term reference count would kind of suggest it would count regions
present.
So perhaps a comment along the lines of
/* xarray that stores if a region has previously been seen in a node */
and rename to node_region_seen_xa.
However, can we just use a bitmap sized to MAX_NUMNODES which is
a nodemask_t which gives us the helpers nodemask.h
> +static DEFINE_XARRAY(node_regions_xa);
> +
> static struct cxl_region *to_cxl_region(struct device *dev);
>
> #define __ACCESS_ATTR_RO(_level, _name) { \
> @@ -2442,14 +2446,8 @@ static bool cxl_region_update_coordinates(struct cxl_region *cxlr, int nid)
>
> for (int i = 0; i < ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX; i++) {
> if (cxlr->coord[i].read_bandwidth) {
> - rc = 0;
> - if (cxl_need_node_perf_attrs_update(nid))
> - node_set_perf_attrs(nid, &cxlr->coord[i], i);
> - else
> - rc = cxl_update_hmat_access_coordinates(nid, cxlr, i);
> -
> - if (rc == 0)
> - cset++;
> + node_update_perf_attrs(nid, &cxlr->coord[i], i);
> + cset++;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2475,6 +2473,7 @@ static int cxl_region_perf_attrs_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> struct node_notify *nn = arg;
> int nid = nn->nid;
> int region_nid;
> + int rc;
>
> if (action != NODE_ADDED_FIRST_MEMORY)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> @@ -2487,6 +2486,11 @@ static int cxl_region_perf_attrs_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> if (nid != region_nid)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> + /* No action needed if there's existing entry */
> + rc = xa_insert(&node_regions_xa, nid, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
So this is using the NULL entry quirk of xa_insert() where
a reserved entry is put in place so next time we match.
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> if (!cxl_region_update_coordinates(cxlr, nid))
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> @@ -3638,6 +3642,7 @@ int cxl_region_init(void)
>
> void cxl_region_exit(void)
> {
> + xa_destroy(&node_regions_xa);
> cxl_driver_unregister(&cxl_region_driver);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-20 19:47 [PATCH v2 0/4] cxl, acpi/hmat, node: Update CXL access coordinates to node directly Dave Jiang
2025-08-20 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Update comment for hotplug memory callback priorities Dave Jiang
2025-08-21 21:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-29 14:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-20 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drivers/base/node: Add a helper function node_update_perf_attrs() Dave Jiang
2025-08-20 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cxl, acpi/hmat: Update CXL access coordinates directly instead of through HMAT Dave Jiang
2025-08-29 15:15 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-08-20 19:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] acpi/hmat: Remove now unused hmat_update_target_coordinates() Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250829161529.0000220a@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.herbert@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®