From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH perf/core 08/11] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe multi context registers changes test
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 16:35:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250902143504.1224726-9-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902143504.1224726-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
Adding test to check we can change common register values through
uprobe program.
It's x86_64 specific test.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c | 1 +
.../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c | 24 ++++
3 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
index 4a0670c056ba..2425fd26d1ea 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <unistd.h>
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <test_progs.h>
#include <network_helpers.h>
#include <bpf/btf.h>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
index 2ee17ef1dae2..012652b07399 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include <unistd.h>
#include <pthread.h>
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <test_progs.h>
#include "uprobe_multi.skel.h"
#include "uprobe_multi_bench.skel.h"
@@ -1340,6 +1341,111 @@ static void test_bench_attach_usdt(void)
printf("%s: detached in %7.3lfs\n", __func__, detach_delta);
}
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+__naked __maybe_unused unsigned long uprobe_regs_change_trigger(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "ret\n"
+ );
+}
+
+static __naked void uprobe_regs_change(struct pt_regs *before, struct pt_regs *after)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "movq %r11, 48(%rdi)\n"
+ "movq %r10, 56(%rdi)\n"
+ "movq %r9, 64(%rdi)\n"
+ "movq %r8, 72(%rdi)\n"
+ "movq %rax, 80(%rdi)\n"
+ "movq %rcx, 88(%rdi)\n"
+ "movq %rdx, 96(%rdi)\n"
+ "movq %rsi, 104(%rdi)\n"
+ "movq %rdi, 112(%rdi)\n"
+
+ /* save 2nd argument */
+ "pushq %rsi\n"
+ "call uprobe_regs_change_trigger\n"
+
+ /* save return value and load 2nd argument pointer to rax */
+ "pushq %rax\n"
+ "movq 8(%rsp), %rax\n"
+
+ "movq %r11, 48(%rax)\n"
+ "movq %r10, 56(%rax)\n"
+ "movq %r9, 64(%rax)\n"
+ "movq %r8, 72(%rax)\n"
+ "movq %rcx, 88(%rax)\n"
+ "movq %rdx, 96(%rax)\n"
+ "movq %rsi, 104(%rax)\n"
+ "movq %rdi, 112(%rax)\n"
+
+ /* restore return value and 2nd argument */
+ "pop %rax\n"
+ "pop %rsi\n"
+
+ "movq %rax, 80(%rsi)\n"
+ "ret\n"
+ );
+}
+
+static void unique_regs_common(void)
+{
+ struct pt_regs before = {}, after = {}, expected = {
+ .rax = 0xc0ffe,
+ .rcx = 0xbad,
+ .rdx = 0xdead,
+ .r8 = 0x8,
+ .r9 = 0x9,
+ .r10 = 0x10,
+ .r11 = 0x11,
+ .rdi = 0x12,
+ .rsi = 0x13,
+ };
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_uprobe_multi_opts, opts,
+ .unique = true,
+ );
+ struct uprobe_multi *skel;
+
+ skel = uprobe_multi__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
+ return;
+
+ skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+ skel->bss->regs = expected;
+
+ skel->links.uprobe_change_regs = bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi(
+ skel->progs.uprobe_change_regs,
+ -1, "/proc/self/exe",
+ "uprobe_regs_change_trigger",
+ &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.uprobe_change_regs, "bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ uprobe_regs_change(&before, &after);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(after.rax, expected.rax, "ax");
+ ASSERT_EQ(after.rcx, expected.rcx, "cx");
+ ASSERT_EQ(after.rdx, expected.rdx, "dx");
+ ASSERT_EQ(after.r8, expected.r8, "r8");
+ ASSERT_EQ(after.r9, expected.r9, "r9");
+ ASSERT_EQ(after.r10, expected.r10, "r10");
+ ASSERT_EQ(after.r11, expected.r11, "r11");
+ ASSERT_EQ(after.rdi, expected.rdi, "rdi");
+ ASSERT_EQ(after.rsi, expected.rsi, "rsi");
+
+cleanup:
+ uprobe_multi__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_unique(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("unique_regs_common"))
+ unique_regs_common();
+}
+#else
+static void test_unique(void) { }
+#endif
+
void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("skel_api"))
@@ -1372,5 +1478,6 @@ void test_uprobe_multi_test(void)
test_session_cookie_skel_api();
if (test__start_subtest("session_cookie_recursive"))
test_session_recursive_skel_api();
+ test_unique();
RUN_TESTS(uprobe_multi_verifier);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
index 44190efcdba2..f26f8b840985 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi.c
@@ -141,3 +141,27 @@ int usdt_extra(struct pt_regs *ctx)
/* we need this one just to mix PID-filtered and global USDT probes */
return 0;
}
+
+#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86)
+struct pt_regs regs;
+
+SEC("uprobe.unique")
+int BPF_UPROBE(uprobe_change_regs)
+{
+ pid_t cur_pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
+
+ if (cur_pid != pid)
+ return 0;
+
+ ctx->ax = regs.ax;
+ ctx->cx = regs.cx;
+ ctx->dx = regs.dx;
+ ctx->r8 = regs.r8;
+ ctx->r9 = regs.r9;
+ ctx->r10 = regs.r10;
+ ctx->r11 = regs.r11;
+ ctx->di = regs.di;
+ ctx->si = regs.si;
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 14:34 [PATCH perf/core 00/11] uprobes: Add unique uprobe Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 14:34 ` [PATCH perf/core 01/11] uprobes: Add unique flag to uprobe consumer Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 15:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-09-03 6:35 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-03 10:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-09-03 12:02 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 14:34 ` [PATCH perf/core 02/11] uprobes: Skip emulate/sstep on unique uprobe when ip is changed Jiri Olsa
2025-09-03 11:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-09-03 18:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-03 19:57 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-03 19:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-04 8:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-09-04 10:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-04 11:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-09-04 15:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-04 18:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-04 18:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-09-04 19:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-05 8:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-09-02 14:34 ` [PATCH perf/core 03/11] perf: Add support to attach standard unique uprobe Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 16:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-03 3:32 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-03 11:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-09-03 13:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-03 13:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-09-02 14:34 ` [PATCH perf/core 04/11] bpf: Add support to attach uprobe_multi " Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 16:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-03 6:35 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-03 15:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-03 19:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 14:34 ` [PATCH perf/core 05/11] bpf: Allow uprobe program to change context registers Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 14:34 ` [PATCH perf/core 06/11] libbpf: Add support to attach unique uprobe_multi uprobe Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 14:35 ` [PATCH perf/core 07/11] libbpf: Add support to attach generic unique uprobe Jiri Olsa
2025-09-03 18:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-02 14:35 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2025-09-02 14:35 ` [PATCH perf/core 09/11] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe multi context ip register change test Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 14:35 ` [PATCH perf/core 10/11] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe multi unique attach test Jiri Olsa
2025-09-02 14:35 ` [PATCH perf/core 11/11] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe " Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250902143504.1224726-9-jolsa@kernel.org \
--to=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®